* Steve Langasek wrote:
> Frederik Schueler wrote:
> > #369517: linux-image-2.6.16-1-alpha-smp: undefined scsi symbols;
> > fails to allocate percpu data
>
> The alpha smp kernel didn't work in sarge either. I would suggest
> dropping this flavor until someone steps up to maintain it.
Agreed, I'm
On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 11:41:50PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> It would be nice if #381951 could be considered for inclusion.
Note that this will increase the size of the resultant image by ~8k,
is that within bounds for d-i? Can we get away with just enabling this
on the 686[-pae] subarchs (and do
On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 01:05:07PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 03:17:58PM +0200, Frederik Schueler wrote:
>
> > the next 2.6.17 upload, version 2.6.17-7 should become a candidate for
> > testing.
>
> > I would like to schedule the upload for Wednesday, Aug. 23.
>
> > a
On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 03:17:58PM +0200, Frederik Schueler wrote:
> #342246: [ia64 headers] arch/ia64/modules.lds: No such file or
> directory
This should be fixed by r7212
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 03:17:58PM +0200, Frederik Schueler wrote:
> the next 2.6.17 upload, version 2.6.17-7 should become a candidate for
> testing.
> I would like to schedule the upload for Wednesday, Aug. 23.
> amd64 and i386 will go through NEW again, due to the added xen images.
> we have
Hello,
the next 2.6.17 upload, version 2.6.17-7 should become a candidate for
testing.
I would like to schedule the upload for Wednesday, Aug. 23.
amd64 and i386 will go through NEW again, due to the added xen images.
we have 4 RC bugs left, of which 2 need immediate attention:
#342246: [ia6
6 matches
Mail list logo
