On Monday 24 April 2006 20:53, David Härdeman wrote:
> Okey, I've updated the patch to include the symlink. Lintian seems to
> think that the udeb is allright. Does the attached patch look ok?
If lintian is happy, who are we - mere mortals - to say it's not OK?
Go for it.
pgpAs3wd64QYX.pgp
Desc
On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 02:42:43AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
(sorry for the delay)
No problem, thanks for the review.
On Friday 21 April 2006 10:58, David Härdeman wrote:
The patch is attached to bug report 358671:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=358671
I get one error from
On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 02:42:43AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> (sorry for the delay)
> On Friday 21 April 2006 10:58, David Härdeman wrote:
> > The patch is attached to bug report 358671:
> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=358671
> I get one error from lintian:
> E: libpopt0-udeb
(sorry for the delay)
On Friday 21 April 2006 10:58, David Härdeman wrote:
> The patch is attached to bug report 358671:
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=358671
I get one error from lintian:
E: libpopt0-udeb udeb: ldconfig-symlink-missing-for-shlib lib/libpopt.so.0
lib/libpopt.
In order to support device-mapper crypto in partman-crypto, a cryptsetup udeb
is needed.
In order to create a cryptsetup udeb, a libpopt0 udeb is necessary.
I've written a patch against popt, but it's the first udeb patch I've ever
done, so I'd appreciate if someone with udeb experience could revi
5 matches
Mail list logo