Re: Out-of-tree kernel module udeb

2015-05-20 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Thu, 2015-05-21 at 00:12 +0200, maximilian attems wrote: > On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 01:36:53PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > On Sun, 2015-05-17 at 13:25 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > > > > > At the moment only spl is available in the archive, using dkms, and > > > > for zfs it's similar in

Re: Out-of-tree kernel module udeb

2015-05-20 Thread maximilian attems
On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 01:36:53PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Sun, 2015-05-17 at 13:25 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > > > At the moment only spl is available in the archive, using dkms, and > > > for zfs it's similar in the way of packaging though not uploaded yet. > > > What we have (cod

Re: Out-of-tree kernel module udeb

2015-05-17 Thread Aron Xu
On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 9:39 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Ben Hutchings (2015-05-17): >> On Sun, 2015-05-17 at 13:25 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: >> > My personal stance on kernel related things would be "upstream first". >> > If it ain't going to be merged into mainline, or at least accepted as

Re: Out-of-tree kernel module udeb

2015-05-17 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Ben Hutchings (2015-05-17): > On Sun, 2015-05-17 at 13:25 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > My personal stance on kernel related things would be “upstream first”. > > If it ain't going to be merged into mainline, or at least accepted as a > > patchset (like e.g. aufs3 or rt in wheezy) for src:linu

Re: Out-of-tree kernel module udeb

2015-05-17 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Turbo Fredriksson (2015-05-17): > On May 17, 2015, at 1:25 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > My personal stance on kernel related things would be “upstream first”. > > I'm not exactly sure what you mean by that, but if you mean that upstream > (i.e. ZFS On Linux - "ZoL" in this case) should have the

Re: Out-of-tree kernel module udeb

2015-05-17 Thread Turbo Fredriksson
On May 17, 2015, at 1:25 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Aron Xu (2015-05-17): >> At the moment only spl is available in the archive, using dkms, and >> for zfs it's similar in the way of packaging though not uploaded yet. >> What we have (code ready to go) is a mechanism that detects/gets >> defini

Re: Out-of-tree kernel module udeb

2015-05-17 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Sun, 2015-05-17 at 13:25 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Hi, > > Aron Xu (2015-05-17): > > [Not on list, please keep me posted.] > > [done] > > > I'm wondering whether d-i team would like to accept out-of-tree kernel > > module udeb for certain feat

Re: Out-of-tree kernel module udeb

2015-05-17 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Hi, Aron Xu (2015-05-17): > [Not on list, please keep me posted.] [done] > I'm wondering whether d-i team would like to accept out-of-tree kernel > module udeb for certain features, for example ZFS support? And if the > answer is yes, what's the best way of doing

Out-of-tree kernel module udeb

2015-05-17 Thread Aron Xu
[Not on list, please keep me posted.] Hi, I'm wondering whether d-i team would like to accept out-of-tree kernel module udeb for certain features, for example ZFS support? And if the answer is yes, what's the best way of doing it? Two years ago we had a GSoC project to provide ZF