Re: Bug#612317: No RN info about Btrfs

2013-05-01 Thread Julien Cristau
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 19:22:52 +, Ben Hutchings wrote: > The release notes should say that btrfs is still a tech preview. It is > not ready for production in Linux 3.2 and this will not be fixed in time > for release. > Should be covered by http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/ddp/manuals/trun

Re: No RN info about Btrfs

2013-03-30 Thread Aron Xu
I haven't tried to install the system for quite a while, but it would be nice to confirm that whether btrfs for /boot is supported now. If a separate /boot is needed then it definitely worth to be added to RN. -- Regards, Aron Xu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org

Re: No RN info about Btrfs

2013-03-30 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Sat, 2013-03-30 at 14:48 -0400, David Prévot wrote: > Control: tags -1 moreinfo > > Hi, > > On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 01:26:01AM +0800, Aron Xu wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 01:09, Matteo Cortese > > wrote: > > > It is still not clear to me whether the installer recognizes and creates > >

No RN info about Btrfs

2013-03-30 Thread David Prévot
Control: tags -1 moreinfo Hi, On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 01:26:01AM +0800, Aron Xu wrote: > On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 01:09, Matteo Cortese > wrote: > > It is still not clear to me whether the installer recognizes and creates > > Btrfs partitions. > If it does, it should be added to the release notes