On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 10:54:58PM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> Artur Gorniak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I couldn't start Sparcstation 2 from potato and current woody disks.
> >
> > It's working with Ben's one.
> >
> > It was hanged just after Booting Linux message.
>
> No idea what th
Artur Gorniak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I couldn't start Sparcstation 2 from potato and current woody disks.
>
> It's working with Ben's one.
>
> It was hanged just after Booting Linux message.
No idea what the issue is. Please try 2.3.5 when that releases or
tests, I guess. Maybe it's f
I couldn't start Sparcstation 2 from potato and current woody disks.
It's working with Ben's one.
It was hanged just after Booting Linux message.
Artur Górniak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
IRCNET: ArchieI, Joshy, GJosh irc.openprojects.net: ArchieI [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CHANS: #radosc, #debian-pl
On Sun, May 13, Ben Collins wrote:
> > If I look at the size of the Image: Could it be that tilo prints
> > a warning about PROMs and 5MB or so ? The error messages I read
> > here assumes this.
>
> Yes, but I got this with all the potato images aswell, and they booted
> just fine. I don't think
On Sun, May 13, 2001 at 07:38:24AM +0200, Thorsten Kukuk wrote:
> On Sat, May 12, Ben Collins wrote:
>
> > Let me know how things go.
> >
> > http://auric.debian.org/~bcollins/disks-sparc/current/
> >
> > For netboot, you should only need the tftpimage under the subarch
> > directory of your ch
On Sat, May 12, Ben Collins wrote:
> Let me know how things go.
>
> http://auric.debian.org/~bcollins/disks-sparc/current/
>
> For netboot, you should only need the tftpimage under the subarch
> directory of your choice. The rest of the install should be able to
> download everything else itsel
Ben Collins writes:
> Let me know how things go.
It gets an illegal instruction immediately on my sb1000.
Something is hosed with the TILO image I think. The 'linux-a.out'
image, on the other hand, booted just fine on the machine.
Later,
David S. Miller
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
I have an Ultra1 and I installed Debian using the boot floppies. Typing in
"boot floopy" at the ok prompt seemed to work just fine.
Tom Korte
On Sat, 12 May 2001 14:58:49 Ben Collins wrote:
> On Sat, May 12, 2001 at 04:40:51PM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> > Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writ
* Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010512 14:00]:
> Yeah. That's why I'm just worrying about sun4u, since I can test those.
> Let me know if there are any oddities with sparc32 boot.
Sadly, it doesn't seem to work on the AX1105 (similar to SB100) that I
have here:
ok boot net
Boo
On Sat, May 12, 2001 at 04:40:51PM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > These are based on the latest CVS of boot-floppies. The major change is
> > that the sun4u images are built from the 2.4.4 kernel images. The best
> > part about this is that this means
Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> These are based on the latest CVS of boot-floppies. The major change is
> that the sun4u images are built from the 2.4.4 kernel images. The best
> part about this is that this means that should support Blade 100/1000
> (don't hold me to this, I can't test
These are based on the latest CVS of boot-floppies. The major change is
that the sun4u images are built from the 2.4.4 kernel images. The best
part about this is that this means that should support Blade 100/1000
(don't hold me to this, I can't test them) since they are synced with
vger CVS as of
12 matches
Mail list logo
