On Thu, 2009-06-04 at 10:42 +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Thursday 04 June 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
> > There are three things you need to accomplish:
> > 1) include the kernel udebs for 686-bigmem on the image
> > 2) include the 686-bigmem kernel-image deb (+ maybe headers packages?)
> > 3) support i
On Thursday 04 June 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
> There are three things you need to accomplish:
> 1) include the kernel udebs for 686-bigmem on the image
> 2) include the 686-bigmem kernel-image deb (+ maybe headers packages?)
> 3) support it in build scripts on farbror (d-cd buildd) and possibly
>
On Thursday 04 June 2009, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-06-04 at 01:10 +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
>
> [...snipped a bunch of good points which I won't contest...]
:-)
> > But there is one image that might exactly fit the bill: the
> > i386/amd64/ppc multi-arch netinst CD. Current size (Lenny):
On Thu, 2009-06-04 at 01:10 +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
[...snipped a bunch of good points which I won't contest...]
> Personally I would say that full CD and DVD are not even very interesting
> for Xen installs: their content is desktop oriented, so why download a
> lot of shite you're not going t
On Friday 22 May 2009, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-04-18 at 12:49 +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> > Also note that adding the 686-bigmem kernel to CD images still has a
> > rather high impact (as you'd need to add both the kernel udeb _and_
> > the regular kernel-image deb), which is rather undesi
[adding debian-cd. The context is trying to figure out how to support
installation from CD/DVD into a Xen guest -- this requires a PAE
(==686-bigmem) kernel for 32 bit to run under Xen, both for the
installer itself and the final target kernel, hence the is a need to
either fit a 686-bigmem-di udeb
On Sun, 2009-05-10 at 02:11 +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> I see this was committed, but AFAICT without any comment in the
> debian/changelog. Please document changes properly!
Oops, sorry. $PWD is usually installer/build when I commit and the
changelog is a level back in ../debian so I always forget
On Wednesday 06 May 2009, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-04-18 at 09:45 +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > Since the Xen modules will be included in the next
> > linux-kernel-di-amd64-2.6 upload I'd like to also add a netboot-xen
> > target to the build.
> >
> > What are peoples feelings on this pa
On Sat, 2009-04-18 at 09:45 +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Since the Xen modules will be included in the next
> linux-kernel-di-amd64-2.6 upload I'd like to also add a netboot-xen
> target to the build. This is slightly unusual since, unlike i386, the
> standard kernel used on amd64 is X
On Sat, 2009-04-18 at 12:49 +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Saturday 18 April 2009, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > I think the ability to symlink the kernel or initrd will also be useful
> > to me when I start to consider cdrom-xen variants for both i386 and
> > amd64. i386 cannot share the kernel (needs 686
On Saturday 18 April 2009, Ian Campbell wrote:
> I think the ability to symlink the kernel or initrd will also be useful
> to me when I start to consider cdrom-xen variants for both i386 and
> amd64. i386 cannot share the kernel (needs 686-bigmem variant) but can
> share the initrd with some small
Hi all,
Since the Xen modules will be included in the next
linux-kernel-di-amd64-2.6 upload I'd like to also add a netboot-xen
target to the build. This is slightly unusual since, unlike i386, the
standard kernel used on amd64 is Xen capable and therefore the regular
images work just fine. However
12 matches
Mail list logo
