Re: Nano-tiny (e.a) vs libslang-utf8

2002-01-19 Thread Jordi Mallach
On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 07:44:35PM -0700, Chris Tillman wrote: > This was the same symptom that was cured in boot-floppies last > month. I believe it was due to building the package with non-utf8 > slang/newt, right Adam? I tried building nano-tiny with slang1-utf8-dev, same results. Jordi -- J

Re: Nano-tiny (e.a) vs libslang-utf8

2002-01-18 Thread Chris Tillman
On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 08:33:46PM +, Jan Vroonhof wrote: > nano-tiny & jed : show only characters upto high-bit character on that > line. Rest invisible (but cursor moves normally), saving the file > gives the expected results (with all the invisible characters) This was the same symptom tha

Re: Bug#129694: Nano-tiny (e.a) vs libslang-utf8

2002-01-18 Thread Jordi Mallach
retitle 129694 slang1-utf8 breaks displays in slang apps reassign 129694 slang1-utf8 merge 129694 128255 129415 thanks Hi Jan & the rest, On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 08:33:46PM +, Jan Vroonhof wrote: > First of all I can confirm this happens with 1.0.6-2 as well. > In fact I tried doing this in

Nano-tiny (e.a) vs libslang-utf8

2002-01-18 Thread Jan Vroonhof
First of all I can confirm this happens with 1.0.6-2 as well. In fact I tried doing this in all slang based editors I have installed. I tried two tests 1. Loading the following file /tmp/nano-1.1.5> LANG=C less /tmp/testje "/tmp/testje" may be a binary file. See it anyway? pondpond The i