N m

2017-04-22 Thread Suzie McCandless
Sent from my iPhone

N m

2017-04-22 Thread Suzie McCandless
Sent from my iPhone

Gnome installability vs. GNU/kFreeBSD (was: "tasksel arch any" vs. "keeping track of n-m in debian-cd"?)

2013-04-09 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Cyril Brulebois (09/04/2013): > Then I think I'd rather ask you to keep doing so for wheezy's > lifetime, than trying to fiddle with tasksel at this very late point > of the freeze. To clarify as I did on IRC: 1. I thought both the addition of iw and network-manager-gnome as Depends or Recom

Re: "tasksel arch any" vs. "keeping track of n-m in debian-cd"?

2013-04-09 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Thanks Steve. Steve McIntyre (09/04/2013): > What I did for RC1 in debian-cd was to add network-manager and > network-manager-gnome to tasks/wheezy/Debian-{gnome,generic} *before* > task-essential-gnome. That made sure that those two packages made it > onto CD#1 regardless of other dependencies.

Re: "tasksel arch any" vs. "keeping track of n-m in debian-cd"?

2013-04-09 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 10:47:33PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: >Joey Hess (07/03/2013): > >> Re #697868, I would much rather leave it to the maintainers of >> desktop environments (and/or Tech Ctte :P) to ensure that they have >> eg, necessary network-manager dependencies on appropriate >> archi

"tasksel arch any" vs. "keeping track of n-m in debian-cd"?

2013-04-05 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Joey Hess (07/03/2013): > My concerns with going arch any would be that it becomes slower to > make a tasksel change for some pressing concern, and this magnifies > any installation breakage, or blockage caused by task > dependencies. The same reason we keep debootstrap arch all. I'm not sure I s