Hi Martin
On Oct 26, 2007 2:49 AM, Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> lowmem 2 Oct 25 13:45:22 - Oct 25 14:49:07 1:04
> lowmem 1 Oct 25 16:54:59 - Oct 25 19:46:35 2:52
I still get the same results with lowmem level 1 installations and
flash-kernel_1.5 (corrected menu-item number)
Hi Joey
On 10/25/07, Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > Below are the last few messages in syslog. I ran out of time before I
> > was able to fully investigate this problem, so I don't know if it is a
> > symptom of using lowmem level 1 for the installation.
> >
>
* Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-10-25 19:58]:
> The installation yesterday (lowmem level 2) started at 04:25:27 and
> reached localechooser at 05:36:20 (elapsed time = 01:10:53). The
> installation I did today using lowmem level 1 started at 03:29:55 and
> reached localechooser at 06:0
* Gordon Farquharson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-10-22 06:22]:
> Starting OpenBSD Secure Shell server: sshd.
> Starting periodic command scheduler: crond.
>
> Below are the last few messages in syslog. I ran out of time before I
> was able to fully investigate this problem, so I don't know if it is
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> INIT: Entering runlevel: 2
> Starting system log daemon
> Starting kernel log daemon
> Starting OpenBSD Secure Shell server: sshd.
> Starting periodic command scheduler: crond.
>
> Below are the last few messages in syslog. I ran out of time before I
> was able to
Forwarded from
http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2007/10/msg00592.html
- Forwarded message from Gordon Farquharson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: Gordon Farquharson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Memory savings
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 06:22:24 -0600
To: Martin Michlmayr <[
Hi Martin
On 9/28/07, Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-06-28 15:05]:
> > I have high hopes for the nslu2, maybe it will be able to work w/o
> > lowmem level 2 now. Haven't been able to check yet.
>
> I just booted nslu2 in lowmem level 2 and didn'
* Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-06-28 15:05]:
> I have high hopes for the nslu2, maybe it will be able to work w/o
> lowmem level 2 now. Haven't been able to check yet.
I just booted nslu2 in lowmem level 2 and didn't see any big
difference to etch at all (maybe 400 KB). From what I underst
On Thu, Jun 28, 2007 at 03:05:48PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Colin Watson wrote:
> > Somebody (architecture maintainers?) should update lowmem for all of
> > this.
>
> For i386 it seems that lowmem level 1 can be dropped from 72 to 48 mb.
> The max memory usage point is just before anna loads temp
Colin Watson wrote:
> Somebody (architecture maintainers?) should update lowmem for all of
> this.
For i386 it seems that lowmem level 1 can be dropped from 72 to 48 mb.
The max memory usage point is just before anna loads templates, when it
gets down to ~5 mb free. This jumps to ~15 mb free after
Executive summary: I've shaved somewhere around 20MB off d-i's memory
use in a netboot test. Share and enjoy.
Firstly, I fixed a number of reference-counting bugs and other memory
leaks in cdebconf. Most notably, the process of loading a templates file
didn't properly free each parsed RFC822 stan
11 matches
Mail list logo
