On Thursday 13 December 2007, Andrew McGlashan wrote:
> Frans Pop wrote:
> > Yes. One using the Lenny installer and only including
> > the kernel images for the new Etch kernel.
>
> The image list sounds good to me. But which archs did you have in mind?
That's not really up to me, but having an i
On Friday 14 December 2007, you wrote:
> > 2) Creating a second Etch installer based on the new kernel
> > ---
> Not saying its a good idea, but what would be the issues with creating
> additional flavors of select etch installers builds? e.g.
On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 10:20:45PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> 1) A new version of the Etch installer with support for both kernels
>
> This option would IMNSHO be insanity.
>
> First, I doubt people who are able and will want to w
Hi,
Frans Pop wrote:
Yes. One using the Lenny installer and only including
the kernel images for the new Etch kernel.
The image list sounds good to me. But which archs did you have in mind?
btw your latest reply still had the wrong address for project-etchnahalf.
No, it didn't. At least, n
On Thursday 13 December 2007, Andrew McGlashan wrote:
> Frans Pop wrote:
> > Note that my options 3 and 4 basically _are_ your option 5: the
> > official Etch installer is not touched.
>
> Okay, so option 4 includes the building of a netinst image then?
Yes. One using the Lenny installer and only
Hi,
Frans Pop wrote:
Note that my options 3 and 4 basically _are_ your option 5: the
official Etch installer is not touched.
Okay, so option 4 includes the building of a netinst image then?
btw your latest reply still had the wrong address for project-etchnahalf.
Kind Regards
AndrewM
Andrew
December 13, 2007 8:20 AM
Subject: etch+1/2 D-I options (was: Meeting for etch and a half)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(No need to CC me; I'm subscribed to the debian-boot list.)
On Thursday 13 December 2007, Andrew McGlashan wrote:
> I am essentially a novice in this area, but what is wrong with leaving
> the installer as is -- especially netinst? The kernel could be upgraded
> post install if required. I love
On Wednesday 12 December 2007, Frans Pop wrote:
> (Not CCing -release, -kernel and -x as I assume the relevant people will
> be subscribed to the project list. Please follow-up to all three lists.)
Note: the original mail did not reach the etch+1/2 list because I was given
the wrong address...
P
(Not CCing -release, -kernel and -x as I assume the relevant people will be
subscribed to the project list. Please follow-up to all three lists.)
On Tuesday 23 October 2007, dann frazier wrote:
> Now that 2.6.23 is out and the proposed timeframe for etch 1/2 is
> just over two months away, its pro
On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 01:51:59PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 05:36:20PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 28, 2007 at 07:14:06PM -0400, David Nusinow wrote:
> > > Would someone please post irc logs for those of us who can't make that
> > > date?
> >
> > Yes, we
On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 05:36:20PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 28, 2007 at 07:14:06PM -0400, David Nusinow wrote:
> > Would someone please post irc logs for those of us who can't make that date?
>
> Yes, we will.
Here ya go:
http://meetbot.debian.net/meetbot/debian-release.20071031
On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 05:36:20PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 28, 2007 at 07:14:06PM -0400, David Nusinow wrote:
> > Would someone please post irc logs for those of us who can't make that date?
>
> Yes, we will.
Great, thank you!
- David Nusinow
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMA
On Sun, Oct 28, 2007 at 07:14:06PM -0400, David Nusinow wrote:
> Would someone please post irc logs for those of us who can't make that date?
Yes, we will.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Oct 27, 2007 at 06:47:04AM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 06:24:56PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> > (sorry for the nasty cross-posting)
> >
> > hey,
> > Now that 2.6.23 is out and the proposed timeframe for etch 1/2 is
> > just over two months away, its probably a go
On Sat, Oct 27, 2007 at 06:47:02AM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> Looks like 10/31 @ 18:00 GMT works for most, so lets do that.
Oh, and I guess we should pick a location :) I propose #debian-release
for now, when can discuss where to hold future meetings in this one.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUB
On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 06:24:56PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> (sorry for the nasty cross-posting)
>
> hey,
> Now that 2.6.23 is out and the proposed timeframe for etch 1/2 is
> just over two months away, its probably a good time to start making
> some progress on an etch 1/2.
>
> Perhaps we s
dann frazier wrote:
> (sorry for the nasty cross-posting)
>
> hey,
> Now that 2.6.23 is out and the proposed timeframe for etch 1/2 is
> just over two months away, its probably a good time to start making
> some progress on an etch 1/2.
Yes, I think it's a good time to start the discussion.
>
(sorry for the nasty cross-posting)
hey,
Now that 2.6.23 is out and the proposed timeframe for etch 1/2 is
just over two months away, its probably a good time to start making
some progress on an etch 1/2.
Perhaps we should start with an IRC meeting? I've created a wiki page
here with an initial
19 matches
Mail list logo