On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 07:49:03PM +0200, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
> Actually I had this idea before but haven't had any time to implement
> or think more about it. This would be useful for massive multi-OS
> environment since fuse is available on many platforms but many of FS
> drivers
On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 11:18:50AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 06:07:48PM +0800, Bean wrote:
> > Actually I've considered this before. My goal is to add a mini FUSE fs
> > interface so that it can have read/write support in grub2 !
>
> I'm actively uninterested in write su
2009/9/7 Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko :
> On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 11:30 AM, Colin Watson wrote:
>> os-prober mounts filesystems using Linux's filesystem drivers. This of
>> course means that we have to go to special lengths to avoid replaying
>> journals (we don't yet, but we should), we have to lo
On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 11:30 AM, Colin Watson wrote:
> os-prober mounts filesystems using Linux's filesystem drivers. This of
> course means that we have to go to special lengths to avoid replaying
> journals (we don't yet, but we should), we have to load huge piles of
> filesystem modules, etc.
>
On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 6:51 PM, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 06:39:13PM +0800, Bean wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 6:18 PM, Colin Watson wrote:
>> > On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 06:07:48PM +0800, Bean wrote:
>> >> Actually I've considered this before. My goal is to add a mini FUSE fs
2009/9/7 Colin Watson :
> On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 06:39:13PM +0800, Bean wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 6:18 PM, Colin Watson wrote:
>> > The level of functionality provided by the existing filesystem modules
>> > would be quite sufficient.
>>
>> Oh I see, you mean the other way around, using th
On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 06:39:13PM +0800, Bean wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 6:18 PM, Colin Watson wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 06:07:48PM +0800, Bean wrote:
> >> Actually I've considered this before. My goal is to add a mini FUSE fs
> >> interface so that it can have read/write support in
On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 6:18 PM, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 06:07:48PM +0800, Bean wrote:
>> Actually I've considered this before. My goal is to add a mini FUSE fs
>> interface so that it can have read/write support in grub2 !
>
> I'm actively uninterested in write support; in thi
On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 06:07:48PM +0800, Bean wrote:
> Actually I've considered this before. My goal is to add a mini FUSE fs
> interface so that it can have read/write support in grub2 !
I'm actively uninterested in write support; in this case it would do
much more harm than good.
> Of course,
On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 5:30 PM, Colin Watson wrote:
> os-prober mounts filesystems using Linux's filesystem drivers. This of
> course means that we have to go to special lengths to avoid replaying
> journals (we don't yet, but we should), we have to load huge piles of
> filesystem modules, etc.
>
>
os-prober mounts filesystems using Linux's filesystem drivers. This of
course means that we have to go to special lengths to avoid replaying
journals (we don't yet, but we should), we have to load huge piles of
filesystem modules, etc.
Today's crazy idea was to implement a FUSE wrapper for grub-fs
11 matches
Mail list logo
