On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 11:31:33PM +0800, Cameron Patrick wrote:
> Christian Perrier wrote:
>
> | Same rationale for mirror host. As long as we check that default hosts
> | for each country are rock solid mirrors, I see no real interest in
> | keeping this question at high priority.
> |
> | Does
On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 11:31:33PM +0800, Cameron Patrick wrote:
> Christian Perrier wrote:
> | Same rationale for mirror host. As long as we check that default hosts
> | for each country are rock solid mirrors, I see no real interest in
> | keeping this question at high priority.
> |
> | Does so
Christian Perrier wrote:
| Same rationale for mirror host. As long as we check that default hosts
| for each country are rock solid mirrors, I see no real interest in
| keeping this question at high priority.
|
| Does someone object to this?
If this means what I think it does, then yes :-) Here
Hi-
Not necessarily an objection, but if it was the case that previously
people were using many different mirrors, now they will only be using
the default mirror, which may dramatically increase bandwidth
requirements on that mirror, or it'll get really slow.
Erik
Columbia University AcIS
Chri
On Wed, Feb 11, 2004 at 06:46:58PM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Same rationale for mirror host. As long as we check that default hosts
> for each country are rock solid mirrors, I see no real interest in
> keeping this question at high priority.
>
> Does someone object to this?
It seems a go
Folks,
languagechooser/countrychooser is now in a quite stable state. I think
we won't touch this system significantly and, yes, I will stay away
from the Arabic entry, Petter and Joeyh...:-)).
Anyway, even if we do this, we're sure that now we have a good way for
users to enter your language/loc
6 matches
Mail list logo
