Processed: Re: Bug#475783: marked as done (busybox: mounting loopback device fails in initrd (using live-initramfs))

2008-04-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 475783 Bug#475783: busybox: mounting loopback device fails in initrd (using live-initramfs) Bug is already open, cannot reopen. > reassign 475783 live-initramfs Bug#475783: busybox: mounting loopback device fails in initrd (using

Bug#475783: marked as done (busybox: mounting loopback device fails in initrd (using live-initramfs))

2008-04-21 Thread Raphael Hertzog
reopen 475783 reassign 475783 live-initramfs retitle 475783 generated initrd fails mounting loopback device thanks On Mon, 21 Apr 2008, Bastian Blank wrote: > On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 09:28:29AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > > Why aren't you reassigning it to klibc-utils ins

Bug#475783: marked as done (busybox: mounting loopback device fails in initrd (using live-initramfs))

2008-04-21 Thread Bastian Blank
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 09:28:29AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > Why aren't you reassigning it to klibc-utils instead? Its neither a bug in busybox nor in klibc-utils. It is a bug in a non-Debian component. Bastian -- Without followers, evil cannot spread. -- Spock, "And The C

Bug#475783: marked as done (busybox: mounting loopback device fails in initrd (using live-initramfs))

2008-04-21 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Sun, 20 Apr 2008, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 07:37:02PM +0200, Michael Prokop wrote: > > * Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20080420 19:03]: > > > On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 12:51:29AM +0200, Michael Prokop wrote: > > So the mount binary of busybox works whereas t

Bug#475783: busybox: mounting loopback device fails in initrd (using live-initramfs)

2008-04-20 Thread Michael Prokop
Why should this be a bug in my setup? It used to work just fine. I never said that this is a bug in klibc-utils or in busybox, but anyway it's a bug in one of all the involved packages. So why are you closing my bugreport? When I use: mount -t squashfs /dev/loop0 /mnt mounting the squashfs fil

Bug#475783: marked as done (busybox: mounting loopback device fails in initrd (using live-initramfs))

2008-04-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 20 Apr 2008 20:42:44 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Re: Bug#475783: busybox: mounting loopback device fails in initrd (using live-initramfs) has caused the Debian Bug report #475783, regarding busybox: mounting loopback device fails in

Bug#475783: busybox: mounting loopback device fails in initrd (using live-initramfs)

2008-04-20 Thread Michael Prokop
; Nowadays using busybox version 1:1.9.2-2 with different versions of > > klibc-utils, initramfs-tools and live-initramfs fails at the stage > > of mounting the loopback device (being a squashfs file behind). > Please provide commands used and error messages. That's what I can f

Processed: Re: Bug#475783: busybox: mounting loopback device fails in initrd (using live-initramfs)

2008-04-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 475783 moreinfo Bug#475783: busybox: mounting loopback device fails in initrd (using live-initramfs) There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tr

Bug#475783: busybox: mounting loopback device fails in initrd (using live-initramfs)

2008-04-20 Thread Bastian Blank
erent versions of > klibc-utils, initramfs-tools and live-initramfs fails at the stage > of mounting the loopback device (being a squashfs file behind). Please provide commands used and error messages. Bastian -- It is a human characteristic to love little animals, especially if they'

Bug#475783: busybox: mounting loopback device fails in initrd (using live-initramfs)

2008-04-12 Thread Michael Prokop
live-initramfs fails at the stage of mounting the loopback device (being a squashfs file behind). I tested several different software versions in all possible combinations (no setup changes except for the initrds). The results: Working === ii busybox 1:1.1.3-5

Device Drivers & Loopback device

2004-06-29 Thread Da-Breegster at BFDB
o nothing was actually happening. Somebody on debianhelp.org said the loopback device doesn't usually cause problems. I was wondering if I should load drivers from a floppy because my machine is really old. Research concludes that the loopback device is used to mount CD-ROMs. Could my old CD-ROM

Re: Loopback device

2004-06-29 Thread Geert Stappers
? After all the drivers.tgz is a very large file end it takes time to process it, especially on old (old equals slow) hardware. > I researched the loopback device and found out that it's used to mount the > CD-ROM or something. I'm a first timer with Linux, so I'm not sure wh

Loopback device

2004-06-29 Thread Da-Breegster at BFDB
d and tried this several more times. Every time it failed. I researched the loopback device and found out that it's used to mount the CD-ROM or something. I'm a first timer with Linux, so I'm not sure what to do. Maybe the loopback device wasn't being compiled or something? S

Bug#127971: marked as done (boot-floppies: Missing loopback device and localhost in /etc/hosts)

2002-03-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
ed: from pre by saruman.uio.no with local (Exim 2.12 #7) id 16N2W4-00016A-00; Sun, 6 Jan 2002 02:54:28 +0100 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: boot-floppies: Missing loopback device and localhost in /etc/hosts From: Petter Reinholdtsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Message-Id: <[EMAIL PR

Bug#127971: boot-floppies: Missing loopback device and localhost in /etc/hosts

2002-01-07 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
[Philip Blundell] > Did you actually use this option, or did you continue the installation in > some other way (e.g. using the new "chroot without rebooting", or by hitting > Ctrl-Alt-Delete, or anything of that kind)? I'm pretty sure I used the "Reboot the system" entry, after making the boot f

Bug#127971: boot-floppies: Missing loopback device and localhost in /etc/hosts

2002-01-07 Thread Philip Blundell
The appropriate stuff should get written to /etc/hosts and /etc/network/interfaces when you choose "Reboot the system" from the main menu, if the network hasn't ever been configured at that point. It seems that this didn't happen on your machine, for whatever reason. Did you actually use this op

Bug#127971: boot-floppies: Missing loopback device and localhost in /etc/hosts

2002-01-06 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
Package: boot-floppies Version: 3.0.17 Severity: important When installing from CD, and not configuring the network during install, the loopback device is missing from /etc/network/interfaces (giving lots of warnings and error messages after boot, and breaking some server daemons), and

Re: [Rainer Dorsch ] Re: New install / loopback device

2000-06-18 Thread Josip Rodin
On Sun, Jun 18, 2000 at 02:14:24PM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote: > > > > but the new system has no network file. Interestingly the network file > > > > is not known on the upgraded system: > > > > rainer@rakete:~$ dpkg -S /etc/init.d/network > > > > dpkg: /etc/init.d/network not found. > > > > > >

Re: [Rainer Dorsch ] Re: New install / loopback device

2000-06-18 Thread Adam Di Carlo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Karl M. Hegbloom) writes: > From: Rainer Dorsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: New install / loopback device > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2000 09:55:45 +0200 > Resent-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > but the new syste

[Rainer Dorsch ] Re: New install / loopback device

2000-06-17 Thread Karl M. Hegbloom
> > but the new system has no network file. Interestingly the network file > > is not known on the upgraded system: > > rainer@rakete:~$ dpkg -S /etc/init.d/network > > dpkg: /etc/init.d/network not found. > > /etc/init.d/network has never been known by dpkg, btw, it used > to be created by boo

Bug#63964: marked as done (no localhost hostname or loopback device setup on fresh install of potato)

2000-06-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
CTED]> Subject: no localhost hostname or loopback device setup on fresh install of potato X-Reportbug-Version: 0.54 X-Mailer: reportbug 0.54 Date: Thu, 11 May 2000 09:33:22 -0400 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: netbase Version: 3.18-4 Sever