Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sunday 23 December 2007, Colin Watson wrote:
>> All that's required for that, IMO, is for the new di-utils to propagate
>> to testing before any dependent changes are made elsewhere. (Though
>> versioned dependencies are a useful record, and don't have a
On Sunday 23 December 2007, Colin Watson wrote:
> All that's required for that, IMO, is for the new di-utils to propagate
> to testing before any dependent changes are made elsewhere. (Though
> versioned dependencies are a useful record, and don't have a huge cost;
> unlikely to consume more than a
On Fri, Dec 21, 2007 at 02:50:14AM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Thursday 20 December 2007, Colin Watson wrote:
> > No, di-utils is already considered as the equivalent of Essential.
> > Plenty of stuff already uses it without a dependency (although there are
> > a number of dependencies anyway due
On Thursday 20 December 2007, Colin Watson wrote:
> No, di-utils is already considered as the equivalent of Essential.
> Plenty of stuff already uses it without a dependency (although there are
> a number of dependencies anyway due to versioning).
If we're willing to explicitly forego the requirem
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 03:13:28PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> Colin is right of course. I confused lib-di and di-utils :-(
> It also has the advantage that a lot of components already declare a
> dependency on d-i-utils.
>
> That is also the one thing I'm not quite sure about though. If we do this
On Tuesday 11 December 2007, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 06:56:11PM +, Stephen Gran wrote:
> > The second problem is just a practical one: where to put it?
> > libdebian-installer seems like the obvious place at first glance, but
> > maybe something else is set up earlier? It
On Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 06:56:11PM +, Stephen Gran wrote:
> The second problem is just a practical one: where to put it?
> libdebian-installer seems like the obvious place at first glance, but
> maybe something else is set up earlier? It would only need to be
> unpacked on disk relatively earl
This one time, at band camp, Frans Pop said:
> Hi Stephen,
>
> On Monday 10 December 2007, Stephen Gran wrote:
> > So I was looking over the code base last night and wondering about
> > exercises to get myself a little more up to speed on it. One thing that
> > I noticed going through was that th
Hi Stephen,
On Monday 10 December 2007, Stephen Gran wrote:
> So I was looking over the code base last night and wondering about
> exercises to get myself a little more up to speed on it. One thing that
> I noticed going through was that there seems to be quite a lot of
> duplicate code spread th
Hi all,
So I was looking over the code base last night and wondering about
exercises to get myself a little more up to speed on it. One thing that
I noticed going through was that there seems to be quite a lot of
duplicate code spread through the shell scripts, and it seems like a
useful idea to
10 matches
Mail list logo
