Re: Installation report on Dell PowerEdge 1950, 2950, NIC issue

2007-03-23 Thread Frans Pop
On Friday 23 March 2007 15:53, Allard Hoeve wrote: > > Note: the report was never accepted as an installation report because > > of the "Subject:" line. IMO there is no real need to file it as there > > were no issues. > > Ah. Well. It never said so anywhere, just: please report :) No, you misunde

Re: Installation report on Dell PowerEdge 1950, 2950, NIC issue

2007-03-23 Thread Allard Hoeve
The network cards on these servers are detected in reverse order. A fix is in 2.6.19 (pci=bfsort), but for etch we shall have to edit the udev naming persistance rules in order to have NIC1 = eth0, NIC2 = eth1 like other generations of PowerEdges. Please define "reverse order", reverse in re

Re: Installation report on Dell PowerEdge 1950, 2950, NIC issue

2007-03-23 Thread Frans Pop
On Friday 23 March 2007 14:27, Allard Hoeve wrote: > Comments/Problems: > The network cards on these servers are detected in reverse order. A fix > is in 2.6.19 (pci=bfsort), but for etch we shall have to edit the udev > naming persistance rules in order to have NIC1 = eth0, NIC2 = eth1 like > othe