003 11:49:32 +0100
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Install failed at 'installing basesystem'
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Tim
Dijkstra's message of "Thu, 6 Feb 2003 10:25:48 +0100")
From: Mario Lang <[EMAIL PROTECTE
On Thu, 06 Feb 2003 11:49:32 +0100
Mario Lang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: base-installer
> Version: 0.014
>
> > I: Base system installed successfully
> > /target/usr/bin/apt-get: /lib/ld-linux.so.2: version 'GLIBC_2.1.1'
> > not found (required by /target/lib/lib.so.6)
>
> BTW, it app
On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 04:28:45AM -0800, Matt Kraai wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 10:25:48AM +0100, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
> > Well the error I'm getting now is the following:
> >
> > I: Base system installed successfully
> > /target/usr/bin/apt-get: /lib/ld-linux.so.2: version 'GLIBC_2.1.1' not
On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 10:25:48AM +0100, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
> Well the error I'm getting now is the following:
>
> I: Base system installed successfully
> /target/usr/bin/apt-get: /lib/ld-linux.so.2: version 'GLIBC_2.1.1' not
> found (required by /target/lib/lib.so.6)
> /target/usr/bin/apt-get:
On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 10:25:48AM +0100, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
> By the way is it true that also the udeb's are held back
> by the infamous glibc bug, so that if I install sarge I'm working with
> somewhat old versions?
No.
ftp> ls dists/sarge/main/debian-installer
200 PORT comma
Package: base-installer
Version: 0.014
Tim Dijkstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So I tried to install sarge with the business-card image I found at
> http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/netinst/. I haven't succeeded
> yet in getting it installed. The last X times a got stuck at 'installing
Hi,
So I tried to install sarge with the business-card image I found at
http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/netinst/. I haven't succeeded
yet in getting it installed. The last X times a got stuck at 'installing
the base system', weirdly enough I few days ago I passed this point
successfully...
7 matches
Mail list logo