Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> No, I don't want it, but I don't think there should be a seperate
> package for a 600 lines shell script either. It's fine with me if
> you think it is a good idea, though.
Well, I don't see why it should be tied to boot-floppies, either.
--
.
On Sun, Oct 15, 2000 at 10:58:37AM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I wrote:
> > Please give me your advice if packaging busybox and mklibs.sh as seperate
> > packages is a good idea or not. Thanks!
> >
> > This comes to my mind because:
> >
> > 1) Seems boot-floppies won't like to come into
I wrote:
> Please give me your advice if packaging busybox and mklibs.sh as seperate
> packages is a good idea or not. Thanks!
>
> This comes to my mind because:
>
> 1) Seems boot-floppies won't like to come into woody (c.f. Adam)
> 2) Packages like mkinitrd-cd depends on boot-floppies solely f
3 matches
Mail list logo
