On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 02:41:55PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Just had a look at your package (sitting in NEW so using a local build
> in an unclean development chroot). Why use .shlibs.local overrides? At
> least the udeb part seems counter-productive, as that's stripping away
> the versions,
Theodore Ts'o (2019-07-12):
> Sounds good to me. I've managed to dh'ified e2fsprogs debian/rules
> file and am currently testing it in preparation for a new release. If
> we need to add it back later, it should be easier now that
> debian/rules file has shrunk down from ~500 lines to ~200 lines.
On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 10:10:50AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > Colin suggested that I send a quick note to debian-boot to make sure
> > this isn't going to be problematic. Do you think this is going to be
> > an issue. (BTW, there has been size creep in e2fsprogs-udebs over the
> > years; e
Hi,
Theodore Ts'o (2019-07-09):
> I'm planning on simplifying e2fsprogs's debian/rules file, and one of
> the ways I've been thinking about doing this is to stop doing a second
> build just for e2fsprogs-udeb. The main difference has been disabling
> features not needed for the installer, such a
Hi there,
I'm planning on simplifying e2fsprogs's debian/rules file, and one of
the ways I've been thinking about doing this is to stop doing a second
build just for e2fsprogs-udeb. The main difference has been disabling
features not needed for the installer, such as gettext/NLS (which is
respons
5 matches
Mail list logo
