On 04/07/06, Attilio Fiandrotti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Where from can I get the gtk-demo app source?
usually it's built togheter with gtk libraries : you should have it
already compiled and ready to run somewhere in the gtkdfb packages you
built..
But those are linked against the X11 var
The new packages:
http://eddyp.homelinux.net:8080/eddy/g-i/gtk2.8-ppc/libs/
It seems nobody complained about this, but the permissions are wrong
for this. I will fix them tonight when I get home.
--
Regards,
EddyP
=
"Imagination is more important than
Eddy Petrişor wrote:
On 03/07/06, Eddy Petrişor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I also remember that on sven's macintosh (which should be similar o
> yours), back at extremadura, we had to boot textua, run gtk-demo, close
> gtk-demo, and then run the graphical installer as we were
experiencing a
On 03/07/06, Eddy Petrişor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I also remember that on sven's macintosh (which should be similar o
> yours), back at extremadura, we had to boot textua, run gtk-demo, close
> gtk-demo, and then run the graphical installer as we were experiencing a
> system crash very simi
On 30/06/06, Attilio Fiandrotti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I also added a strace for a regular (no video=ofonly) session at the
> same place.
I looked at both dfb and strace logs and this could be bug #342053 :
have you tried booting with the textual frontend, adding "no-hardware"
to directfbr
On 30/06/06, Attilio Fiandrotti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Eddy Petrişor wrote:
> I've build the image with gtk 2.8.18...and it crashes.
A friend tested the PPC mini ISO on a minimac and he had to boot with
video=ofonly to prevent the installer from crashing, and colours were
messed up as usual.
Eddy Petrişor wrote:
Sadness is filling my body as I have seen yet another G-I on powerpc :((
On 29/06/06, Eddy Petrişor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 29/06/06, Attilio Fiandrotti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> ok, there is no hurry: i was just curious to know wheter some ppc
bugs
> >> were
On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 01:14:10PM +0300, Eddy Petrişor wrote:
> On 30/06/06, Attilio Fiandrotti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Eddy Petrişor wrote:
> >> I also added a strace for a regular (no video=ofonly) session at the
> >> same place.
>
> Note that I ran a session with video=ofonly which also
On 30/06/06, Attilio Fiandrotti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Eddy Petrişor wrote:
> I also added a strace for a regular (no video=ofonly) session at the
> same place.
Note that I ran a session with video=ofonly which also crashed, but I
didn't made a trace.
I looked at both dfb and strace logs
Eddy Petrişor wrote:
I also added a strace for a regular (no video=ofonly) session at the
same place.
I looked at both dfb and strace logs and this could be bug #342053 :
have you tried booting with the textual frontend, adding "no-hardware"
to directfbrc and then starting the graphical fr
On 30/06/06, Eddy Petrişor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sadness is filling my body as I have seen yet another G-I on powerpc :((
[snip]
I've build the image with gtk 2.8.18...and it crashes.
> > For sure new libraries will need some testing.
>
> If others don't object, then, after te build of t
Sadness is filling my body as I have seen yet another G-I on powerpc :((
On 29/06/06, Eddy Petrişor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 29/06/06, Attilio Fiandrotti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> ok, there is no hurry: i was just curious to know wheter some ppc bugs
> >> were gone with newer libs.
>
> Please test it extensively yourself first and let us know the
> results. Wider testing is only useful if there are no obvious issues.
>
While on the subject, I've written some notes (see bottom of [1]) about
changes
Involved when building test images based on the new packages.
It's my intentio
On 29/06/06, Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thursday 29 June 2006 10:19, Eddy Petrişor wrote:
> If others don't object, then, after te build of the images, I shall
> make a call for testers for the iso image with new libriaries..
Please test it extensively yourself first and let us kno
On Thursday 29 June 2006 10:19, Eddy Petrişor wrote:
> If others don't object, then, after te build of the images, I shall
> make a call for testers for the iso image with new libriaries..
Please test it extensively yourself first and let us know the results.
Wider testing is only useful if there
On 29/06/06, Attilio Fiandrotti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> ok, there is no hurry: i was just curious to know wheter some ppc bugs
>> were gone with newer libs.
> I am also curious about this. Probably some publicity on -powerpc,
> after I have build some images might be a good way to attract t
Eddy Petrişor wrote:
On 29/06/06, Attilio Fiandrotti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Any chance to build a ppc miniiso with updated dfb, cairodfb and
gtkdfb
>> libs ? there are some still open bugs (#342053, #338191, #341770) for
>> cdebconf-gtk related to PPC architecture that i sustect are rel
Eddy Petrişor wrote:
As a summary, now we have on powerpc:
> I have recompiled the cairo packages yesterday for powerpc tried to
the cairo packages are at:
http://eddyp.homelinux.net:8080/eddy/g-i/gtk2.8-ppc/libs/cairo/libcairo-1.1.10-2/
and gtk+2.0 packages:
[1]
http://eddyp.homelinux.
As a summary, now we have on powerpc:
> I have recompiled the cairo packages yesterday for powerpc tried to
the cairo packages are at:
http://eddyp.homelinux.net:8080/eddy/g-i/gtk2.8-ppc/libs/cairo/libcairo-1.1.10-2/
and gtk+2.0 packages:
[1] http://eddyp.homelinux.net:8080/eddy/g-i/gtk2.8-pp
On 29/06/06, Attilio Fiandrotti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Eddy Petrisor wrote:
> Done, they are available on my router[1], in case anybody else wants them.
> Man, the compilation needed about 1.5GB free disk space..
>
> [1] http://eddyp.homelinux.net:8080/eddy/g-i/gtk2.8-ppc/libs/gtk/2.8.18-4/
Eddy Petrisor wrote:
Done, they are available on my router[1], in case anybody else wants them.
Man, the compilation needed about 1.5GB free disk space..
[1] http://eddyp.homelinux.net:8080/eddy/g-i/gtk2.8-ppc/libs/gtk/2.8.18-4/
Good work! :)
Any chance to build a ppc miniiso with updated
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Eddy Petrişor wrote:
> On 27/06/06, Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Le mardi 27 juin 2006 à 00:29 +0200, Davide Viti a écrit :
>> > I started testing libgtk+2.0-directfb0-udeb_2.8.18-3_i386.udeb
>>
>> I've rebuilt gtk+ against a fixed gl
On 27/06/06, Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Le mardi 27 juin 2006 à 00:29 +0200, Davide Viti a écrit :
> I started testing libgtk+2.0-directfb0-udeb_2.8.18-3_i386.udeb
I've rebuilt gtk+ against a fixed glib, the correct cairo, and without
all loaders except the PNG one. Same place:
Le mardi 27 juin 2006 à 00:29 +0200, Davide Viti a écrit :
> I started testing libgtk+2.0-directfb0-udeb_2.8.18-3_i386.udeb
> and got two problems:
>
> - dependency on libtiff4
> - dependency in libcairo2 (>= 1.0.2-2)
>
> by removing those dependencies I got a working g-i image
I've rebuilt gtk
24 matches
Mail list logo
