Your message dated Thu, 01 Feb 2018 06:52:18 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#887803: fixed in flash-kernel 3.91
has caused the Debian Bug report #887803,
regarding flash-kernel: Machines without Kernel-Flavors do not generate boot.scr
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Processing control commands:
> tags 887803 pending
Bug #887803 [flash-kernel] flash-kernel: Machines without Kernel-Flavors do not
generate boot.scr
Added tag(s) pending.
--
887803: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=887803
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
ot
> specify Kernel-Flavors.
A little more debugging allowed me to fix it:
https://anonscm.debian.org/git/d-i/flash-kernel.git/commit/?id=18d8dd2302ed5ad90d5572e5b6b02639dfeb2b70
live well,
vagrant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-3720-espressobin.dtb
Boot-Script-Path: /boot/boot.scr
U-Boot-Script-Name: bootscr.uboot-generic
Required-Packages: u-boot-tools
Setting Kernel-Flavors in /etc/flash-kernel/db works around the issue:
Machine: Globalscale Marvell ESPRESSOBin Board
Kernel-Flavors: any
Apparently the code I add
Your message dated Sat, 13 Feb 2016 16:25:15 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#813927: fixed in flash-kernel 3.57
has caused the Debian Bug report #813927,
regarding Kernel-Flavors not specified for Lamobo R1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
* Heinrich Schuchardt [2016-02-06 19:18]:
> Lamobo R1 uses the same CPU (Allwinner A20) as LeMaker Banana Pi and
> Cubietech Cubieboard2. So Kernel-Flavors should be the same.
Done in git.
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
Control: tag -1 patch
Thanks
On Sat, Feb 06, 2016 at 07:18:26PM +0100, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
>
> Lamobo R1 uses the same CPU (Allwinner A20) as LeMaker Banana Pi and
> Cubietech Cubieboard2. So Kernel-Flavors should be the same.
>
> Kernel-Flavors: armmp armmp-lpae <&l
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 patch
Bug #813927 [flash-kernel] Kernel-Flavors not specified for Lamobo R1
Added tag(s) patch.
--
813927: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=813927
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Package: flash-kernel
Version: 3.56
Severity: normal
Lamobo R1 uses the same CPU (Allwinner A20) as LeMaker Banana Pi and
Cubietech Cubieboard2. So Kernel-Flavors should be the same.
Machine: Lamobo R1
Kernel-Flavors: armmp armmp-lpae <<<< insert this line
Boot-Script-Path: /boot/
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
> > The current images hoever do not implement this plan. They do not use
> > isolinux. Probably we should decide on that soon now.
>
> Er, I think they do use isolinux, there is isolinux stuff on them and I
> remember seeing an isol
Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-11-09 22:59]:
> > The installer chooses a flavor based on the hardware, so this should not
> > need a great deal of consideration from users.
>
> Slightly unrelated, but anyway... the alpha d-i kernel image is
>
Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
> The current images hoever do not implement this plan. They do not use
> isolinux. Probably we should decide on that soon now.
Er, I think they do use isolinux, there is isolinux stuff on them and I
remember seeing an isolinux error message last time I used a badly corrupt
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-11-09 22:59]:
> > The installer chooses a flavor based on the hardware, so this should not
> > need a great deal of consideration from users.
>
> Slightly unrelated, but anyway... the alpha d-i kernel image is
> currently known as "ge
On Mon, 2003-11-10 at 15:26, Chris Tillman wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 10:59:51PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> > Chris Tillman wrote:
> > > In the old installation manual, there were four (no, 5) flavors of
> > > kernels for i386. In the current kernel module, only
On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 10:59:51PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> Chris Tillman wrote:
> > In the old installation manual, there were four (no, 5) flavors of
> > kernels for i386. In the current kernel module, only one kernel
> > version is listed. Can we dump all the instruc
* Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-11-09 22:59]:
> The installer chooses a flavor based on the hardware, so this should not
> need a great deal of consideration from users.
Slightly unrelated, but anyway... the alpha d-i kernel image is
currently known as "generic" which is very confusing. Can
Chris Tillman wrote:
> In the old installation manual, there were four (no, 5) flavors of
> kernels for i386. In the current kernel module, only one kernel
> version is listed. Can we dump all the instructions for users about
> choosing flavors on i386? (Please say yes).
The install
In the old installation manual, there were four (no, 5) flavors of
kernels for i386. In the current kernel module, only one kernel
version is listed. Can we dump all the instructions for users about
choosing flavors on i386? (Please say yes).
--
Debian GNU/Linux Operating System
By the People
specifically this is on a IDE based PC
the rescue.bin (for flavors bf2.4 and idepci) results in the message
unknown IDE controller on PCI has 00 device f9, VID=8086, DID=244b
also mentioned is the fact that non floppy controller is seen.
When it prompts me to put in the root.bin floppy this
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: MD5
On Monday 10 December 2001 05:13, Claus Hindsgaul wrote:
> Hi debian-cd,
>
> I looked through the Woody install manual and noticed that it claimed that
> i386 CD1-CD4 will boot the following flavors:
>
> CD1 vanilla
> CD2 compa
Hello,
> >CD1 vanilla
> >CD2 compact
> >CD3 idepci
> >CD4 ide
> >Can anyone give a current list?
> You'd have to talk to the debian-cd folks about that.
Or use CVSWEB:
tools/boot/woody/boot-i386
[...]
KTYPE[1]=""
KTYPE[2]="compact"
KTYPE[3]="idepci"
KTYPE[4]="udma100-ext3"
KTYPE[5]="reiserfs"
[.
>The docs say (rescue-boot.sgml), that i386 CD1-CD4 will boot the followin=
>g=20
>flavors:
>
>CD1 vanilla
>CD2 compact
>CD3 idepci
>CD4 ide
>
>Can anyone give a current list?
You'd have to talk to the debian-cd folks about that.
p.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
Søndag den 9. december 2001 13:59 skrev Philip Blundell:
> Neither. The current flavours are vanilla, idepci, compact, reiserfs and
> udma100-ext3.
The docs say (rescue-boot.sgml), that i386 CD1-CD4 will boot the following
flavors:
CD1 vanilla
CD2 compact
CD3 idepci
CD4 ide
Can anyone
On Thu, Jun 21, 2001 at 03:08:37AM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
>
> My idea here, which I think would be pretty easy to implement, would
> be to change around the flavors a bit. The default "flavor" would use
> the -idepci kernel rather than the "vanilla" kern
On Thu, Jun 21, 2001 at 03:08:37AM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> My idea here, which I think would be pretty easy to implement, would
> be to change around the flavors a bit. The default "flavor" would use
> the -idepci kernel rather than the "vanilla" kernel. Vani
Hi.
MO> When trying to boot compact or idepci set under vmware, the kernel says:
MO>
MO> VFS: Insert root floppy to be loaded [...] and press ENTER
MO> VFS: Disk change detected on device fd(2,0)
MO> RAMDISK: Compressed image found on block 0
I use vmware all the time, idepci and compact flawors
When trying to boot compact or idepci set under vmware, the kernel says:
VFS: Insert root floppy to be loaded [...] and press ENTER
VFS: Disk change detected on device fd(2,0)
RAMDISK: Compressed image found on block 0
[now a 2 minute or so pause]
probable hardware bug: clock timer configuration
David Whedon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What is the plan for flavors for woody boot-floppies? The current makefiles try
> to build flavors, but the flavor kernel packages are not available.
They will be when they make it into woody.
--
Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 is out! ( http://ww
What is the plan for flavors for woody boot-floppies? The current makefiles try
to build flavors, but the flavor kernel packages are not available.
David
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > There are a lot of undertermined things like how flavors will be handled.
presumably they have different kernel version numbers (2.2.17-compact,
f.i.) so they'll just build into different packages right? although i
guess you need some kind of a "Provides" for the
> > There are a lot of undertermined things like how flavors will be handled.
>
> So you aren't able to get rid of flavors for debian-installer?
I don't really know. "Flavors" can also correspond to specially-built
kernels, I'm sure people will at least find
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> joey@kite:~/debian/packages/debian-installer>dpkg --contents
>nic-modules-2.4.0_0.001_i386.udeb
[...]
> drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2001-01-24 18:03:05 ./lib/modules/2.4.0/kernel/
> There are a lot of undertermined things lik
32 matches
Mail list logo
