On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 02:03:44PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Wednesday 24 February 2010, أحمد المحمودي wrote:
> > So, after reading #570581, is this actually a fribidi or a newt bug ?
>
> It can probably be argued that it's both :-)
>
> In newt for not initializing and in fribidi for not termi
Hello,
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 11:28:32AM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> It's possible (and arguably sane, on the basis of defence in depth at
> least) to work around this in newt. See:
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=570581
---end quoted text---
I tried Ubuntu's patch righ
On Wednesday 24 February 2010, أحمد المحمودي wrote:
> So, after reading #570581, is this actually a fribidi or a newt bug ?
It can probably be argued that it's both :-)
In newt for not initializing and in fribidi for not terminating.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 02:30:11PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Tuesday 23 February 2010, Frans Pop wrote:
> > Hmmm. If I compare the MANIFEST.udebs from testing and my build the only
> > thing that jumps out is:
> > - libfribidi0-udeb 0.10.9-1+b1 amd64
> > + libfribidi0-udeb 0.19.2-1 a
On Tuesday 23 February 2010, Frans Pop wrote:
> Hmmm. If I compare the MANIFEST.udebs from testing and my build the only
> thing that jumps out is:
> - libfribidi0-udeb 0.10.9-1+b1 amd64
> + libfribidi0-udeb 0.19.2-1 amd64
Confirmed and bug filed (#571044).
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
Looks like syslinux has a regression:
http://people.debian.org/~fjp/tmp/d-i/daily-borked1.png
There's also something wrong with the newt frontend:
http://people.debian.org/~fjp/tmp/d-i/daily-borked2.png
http://people.debian.org/~fjp/tmp/d-i/daily-borked3.png
I also saw that a few days ago with an
6 matches
Mail list logo
