On Tuesday 12 February 2008, Joey Hess wrote:
> Frans Pop wrote:
> > BTW, could it be that this comment in pkg-lists/exclude is obsolete?
> ># some arches and versions of glibc link against libgcc1,
> ># it will be pulled in via library reduction
> >libgcc1 -
> >
> > If I scan all curre
Frans Pop wrote:
> Don't think that is always true in this case.
> Because cdebconf-newt-entropy depends on it and because that is not included
> in the initrs (and thus installed later), I think that will pull in the
> full library (just as the full glibc udeb is pulled in during anna).
libc6-u
On Sunday 10 February 2008, Frans Pop wrote:
> Give libnewt0.52 a proper shlibs file changing the dependencies to
> 'libnewt-udeb' and add an empty libnewt-udeb package in the newt source
> package so that dependencies can be satisfied.
Just to make sure that it's archived somewhere, here's a patc
On Monday 11 February 2008, Joey Hess wrote:
> Frans Pop wrote:
> > OTOH, just adding the lib in the udeb cannot do any harm I guess,
> > except that it could result in the full library getting loaded during
> > anna, which would be a waste of memory. I'll look at that option
> > though.
>
> Well,
Frans Pop wrote:
> OTOH, just adding the lib in the udeb cannot do any harm I guess, except
> that it could result in the full library getting loaded during anna, which
> would be a waste of memory. I'll look at that option though.
Well, that won't happen for most images, since the udeb would be
On Monday 11 February 2008, Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
> Would it be possible to put libnewt.so* in the libnewt-udeb package and
> make the library reduction step use it instead of the system library?
> I would find such behaviour easier to understand; and we could tailor a
> special version of newt clos
On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 03:06:57PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> Well, there is actually another category. We have one library (libnewt0.52)
> that is only included in D-I initrds through library reduction and for
> which no udeb exists.
> Udebs that depend on it are: cdebconf-newt-udeb and cdebconf-
On Sunday 10 February 2008, Frans Pop wrote:
> As you may know, dependencies on glibc udebs are the only category that
> is still incorrect.
Well, there is actually another category. We have one library (libnewt0.52)
that is only included in D-I initrds through library reduction and for
which no
8 matches
Mail list logo
