On Tuesday 18 April 2006 20:52, Joey Hess wrote:
> Frans Pop wrote:
> > Now this _is_ a valid reason to use expert install. That will give
> > you the option to enter module parameters which should still be used
> > after the reboot.
>
> Not anymore, but adding this on the boot line will work:
>
>
Frans Pop wrote:
> Now this _is_ a valid reason to use expert install. That will give you the
> option to enter module parameters which should still be used after the
> reboot.
Not anymore, but adding this on the boot line will work:
3c509.xcvr=3
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Dig
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 361180 Selecting 2.6 kernel when installing using 2.4 will break
> install
Bug#361180: base-installer: Selecting 2.6 kernel when installing using 2.4 will
break install
Changed Bug title.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me
retitle 361180 Selecting 2.6 kernel when installing using 2.4 will break install
thanks
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mon, Apr 10, 2006 at 11:55:26PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> Please do not reply to all. I had set a correct reply-to header for my
> previous mail. In general: please only reply to the bug report
> ([EMAIL PROTECTED]).
OK.
>
> On Monday 10 April 2006 23:36, Jack Carroll wrote:
> > I d
You're still replying to all kinds of addresses you don't need to...
On Tuesday 11 April 2006 01:05, Jack Carroll wrote:
> modprobe 3c509 xcvr=3
> ifup eth0
Now this _is_ a valid reason to use expert install. That will give you the
option to enter module parameters wh
On Mon, Apr 10, 2006 at 10:20:36PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
>
> So, if you'd just accept the 2.4 kernel offered by default, the
> installation will go fine. You can upgrade to a 2.6 kernel after the
> installation finishes.
This procedure worked with a PCI network board (3c59x). The
int
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 361180 important
Bug#361180: base-installer: Selecting 2.6 kernel when installing using 2.4 will
break install
Severity set to `important'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tra
Please do not reply to all. I had set a correct reply-to header for my
previous mail. In general: please only reply to the bug report
([EMAIL PROTECTED]).
On Monday 10 April 2006 23:36, Jack Carroll wrote:
> I don't see any particular reason why an
> installer shouldn't run under a 2.4 kernel, b
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 361180 -1
Bug#361180: base-installer: Selecting 2.6 kernel when installing using 2.4 will
break install
Bug 361180 cloned as bug 361870.
> reassign -1 debian-installer-utils
Bug#361870: base-installer: Selecting 2.6 kernel when installing using
On Mon, Apr 10, 2006 at 10:20:36PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> reassign 361180 base-installer
> retitle Selecting 2.6 kernel when installing using 2.4 will break install
> thanks
>
> On Monday 10 April 2006 21:11, Jack Carroll wrote:
> > That revealed the place where the files get deleted. I'll
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 361180 Selecting 2.6 kernel when installing using 2.4 will break
> install
Bug#361180: Debian installer doesn't install kernel
Changed Bug title.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assis
reassign 361180 base-installer
retitle Selecting 2.6 kernel when installing using 2.4 will break install
thanks
On Monday 10 April 2006 21:11, Jack Carroll wrote:
> That revealed the place where the files get deleted. I'll see if I
> can move the log to disk and attach it to this message.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 361180 base-installer
Bug#361180: Debian installer doesn't install kernel
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `base-installer'.
> retitle Selecting 2.6 kernel when installing using 2.4 will break insta
I have some time today, so I'll resume work on the problem.
You two gentlemen seem to stay up amazingly late at night.
On Mon, Apr 10, 2006 at 02:55:32PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 10, 2006 at 11:56:27AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> >
>
> For a pair of root.img and
On Mon, Apr 10, 2006 at 03:11:58PM -0400, Jack Carroll wrote:
>
> That revealed the place where the files get deleted. I'll see if I
> can move the log to disk and attach it to this message. Just copying a few
> key items from the screen on the test machine:
> It happens at the 93% p
On Mon, Apr 10, 2006 at 11:56:27AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
>
> No, the boot Beta 2 boot floppy should be usable with daily images. After
> all, that's all it does: boot the installer. I don't see how it could
> result in the installer deleting files near the end of the install.
> If it would hav
On Monday 10 April 2006 02:03, Jack Carroll wrote:
> I speculated that the reason for the error might be that the daily
> builds did not include a boot.img floppy, and the root.img and
> net-drivers.img that were provided might not be compatible with the
> Etch RC2 boot.img. Until that quest
On Sun, Apr 09, 2006 at 11:08:51AM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 08:42:02PM -0400, Jack Carroll wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 08:21:52AM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
> > >
> > > What is the reason for using 'expert'?
> >
> > I've been doing it that way for so lon
tion to
> do a dist-upgrade to Etch in /dev/hda2, and get back to what I was
> originally trying to test, which was installing multiple Ethernet driver
> modules on the 2.6.15 kernel. I still have the third set of partitions, to
> test the floppies on when I have a known valid set of floppie
On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 09:18:51PM -0400, Jack Carroll wrote:
> Here you are:
>
> Disk /dev/hda: 80.0 GB, 80026361856 bytes
> 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 9729 cylinders
> Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
>
>Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
> /dev/hd
On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 08:21:52AM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
> Please provide the output of
>
> fdisk -l /dev/hda
>
>
Here you are:
Disk /dev/hda: 80.0 GB, 80026361856 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 9729 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
Device Boot S
On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 08:21:52AM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
> Tags 361180 moreinfo
> thanks
>
> On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 12:23:00AM -0400, Jack Carroll wrote:
> > Package: installation-reports
> >
> > Debian-installer-version: www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer 2006-0406
> > daily build
> >
On Sat, Apr 08, 2006 at 12:19:30AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
>
> On Saturday 08 April 2006 00:03, Jack Carroll wrote:
> > During kernel download, ls /target/boot shows
> > System.map-2.6.15-1-686
> > config-2.6.15-1-686
> > initrd.img-2.6.15-1-686.new
> > vmlinuz-2.6.15-1-686
>
> Good so far. I
On Sat, Apr 08, 2006 at 12:19:30AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> It would also be nice if you used a mail address that does not have
> ridiculous blocking when I send from my normal address:
>
> Your message cannot be delivered to the following recipients:
>
> Recipient address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Saturday 08 April 2006 00:03, Jack Carroll wrote:
> During kernel download, ls /target/boot shows
> System.map-2.6.15-1-686
> config-2.6.15-1-686
> initrd.img-2.6.15-1-686.new
> vmlinuz-2.6.15-1-686
Good so far. I'm assuming that you are looking while the initrd is being
generated and th
- Forwarded message from Jack Carroll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2006 17:08:45 -0400
From: Jack Carroll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#361180: Debian installer doesn't inst
Two of you replied to my bug report. I'll send my replies to both
of you.
On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 01:21:50PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Friday 07 April 2006 06:23, Jack Carroll wrote:
> > FIRST RUN:
> > At reboot, the GRUB screen listed only "Other operating systems",
> > showing th
On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 05:08:45PM -0400, Jack Carroll wrote:
> Two of you replied to my bug report. I'll send my replies to both
> of you.
Oops. Excuse me being too familair with the Debian Bug Tracking System.
>
> On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 01:21:50PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
>
> I'l
On Friday 07 April 2006 06:23, Jack Carroll wrote:
> FIRST RUN:
> At reboot, the GRUB screen listed only "Other operating systems",
> showing the kernel previously installed in /dev/hda1. It didn't list
> the newly installed kernel.
Which probably means that you are running an old grub and
Tags 361180 moreinfo
thanks
On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 12:23:00AM -0400, Jack Carroll wrote:
> Package: installation-reports
>
> Debian-installer-version: www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer 2006-0406
> daily build
> uname -a: Not available. Boot failed.
> Date: 20060406 1800
> Method:Wha
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Tags 361180 moreinfo
Bug#361180: Debian installer doesn't install kernel
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system ad
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer 2006-0406
daily build
uname -a: Not available. Boot failed.
Date: 20060406 1800
Method:
Install command was:
expert hw-detect/start_pcmcia=false
Machine: HP Vectra VL
Processor
33 matches
Mail list logo
