Hi Vincent,
Vincent McIntyre (21/08/2012):
> I was planning to test the beta1 installer using the netboot images.
> I can't see an links on the installer page [1] to relevant beta1
> images. For netinst, there is e.g. [2]. But the equivalent netboot
> location is [3], poking around in there rev
Hi
I was planning to test the beta1 installer using the netboot images.
I can't see an links on the installer page [1] to relevant beta1 images.
For netinst, there is e.g. [2].
But the equivalent netboot location is [3], poking around in there
reveals no images marked as beta1, but somewhat older
Francesca Ciceri (08/08/2012):
> [cc-ing debian-boot: I totally forgot to do it in my first mail, sorry!]
[Please avoid M-F-T: yourlist, that breaks group-reply, which isn't nice
on such topics.]
> Thank you very much for the patch: I've just applied it. I've also
> slightly reworded the final
[cc-ing debian-boot: I totally forgot to do it in my first mail, sorry!]
On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 10:02:41AM +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> Hi,
>
> See attached a very intrusive patch.
>
Thank you very much for the patch: I've just applied it.
I've also slightly reworded the final part (and the
2012/7/2 Christian PERRIER :
> Quoting Samuel Thibault (sthiba...@debian.org):
>> Hello,
>>
>> It'd be good to migrate to testing for b1 also espeakup (just
>> translations) and brltty (description fixup, and d-i udev hardware list
>> update).
> The same stands for eject.
>
> It does not only have
On Tue, 2012-07-03 at 15:38 +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 03:11:55PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > And debootstrap 1.0.42 which contains (Joey+Colin CCd):
> >
> > debootstrap (1.0.42) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
> >
> > * Downgrade the absence of an I
On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 03:11:55PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> And debootstrap 1.0.42 which contains (Joey+Colin CCd):
>
> debootstrap (1.0.42) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
>
> * Downgrade the absence of an InRelease file from a warning to an
> info
> message.
On Tue, 2012-07-03 at 16:28 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Ian Campbell (03/07/2012):
> > And debootstrap 1.0.42 which contains (Joey+Colin CCd):
> >
> > debootstrap (1.0.42) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
> >
> > * Downgrade the absence of an InRelease file from a warning to
Ian Campbell (03/07/2012):
> And debootstrap 1.0.42 which contains (Joey+Colin CCd):
>
> debootstrap (1.0.42) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
>
> * Downgrade the absence of an InRelease file from a warning to an
> info
> message. For now, debootstrap can cope fine
On Mon, 2012-07-02 at 08:53 +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> Quoting Samuel Thibault (sthiba...@debian.org):
> > Hello,
> >
> > It'd be good to migrate to testing for b1 also espeakup (just
> > translations) and brltty (description fixup, and d-i udev hardware list
> > update).
>
>
> The same s
Quoting Samuel Thibault (sthiba...@debian.org):
> Hello,
>
> It'd be good to migrate to testing for b1 also espeakup (just
> translations) and brltty (description fixup, and d-i udev hardware list
> update).
The same stands for eject.
It does not only have translation updates, though, but also
Hello,
It'd be good to migrate to testing for b1 also espeakup (just
translations) and brltty (description fixup, and d-i udev hardware list
update).
Samuel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debia
On Sunday 24 February 2008, Grant Grundler wrote:
> > Grant, do you happen to know a similar trick to detect 64-bit support
> > even when the installer is running with a 32-bit kernel?
>
> Hrm...yes. I explain the "trick" and also some caveats on why I would
> rather leave this user selectable.
OK
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 11:07:03AM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Wednesday 20 February 2008, Grant Grundler wrote:
> > > Please, go in your installed system and use the installation-report
> > > script to send us a full installation report, that way we can get more
> > > information about how things
On Wednesday 20 February 2008, Grant Grundler wrote:
> > Please, go in your installed system and use the installation-report
> > script to send us a full installation report, that way we can get more
> > information about how things went there.
>
> I'm not near the system for the next couple of day
On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 09:54:22AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> <...>
> > And this is my installation report. I didn't see any other guidance
> > on where/how to submit the installation reports.
>
> Please, go in your installed system and use the installation-report
> script to send us a full i
Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Monday 18 February 2008, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> I did it just after answer his mail and was going to ask someone to
>> test. Could you see the attached patch?
>
> I've about to commit a different solution where /var/numcpus is set in
> rootskel. Main
On Monday 18 February 2008, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> + if grep -q 0x00 /sys/bus/parisc/devices/*/hw_type; then
You're only testing for the presence of _a_ processor here. You're not
testing _how many_ there are.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Monday 18 February 2008, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> I did it just after answer his mail and was going to ask someone to
> test. Could you see the attached patch?
I've about to commit a different solution where /var/numcpus is set in
rootskel. Main reason is that that will work better with the ba
Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Monday 18 February 2008, Grant Grundler wrote:
>> Runtime test for the hppa installer might be to scrounge in
>> /sys/bus/parisc/devices for "hw_type" contains "0x00".
>>
>> e.g.:
>> j6k:~# fgrep 0x00 /sys/bus/parisc/devices/*/hw_type
>> /sys/bus/parisc/d
On Monday 18 February 2008, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Grant Grundler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > e.g.:
> > j6k:~# fgrep 0x00 /sys/bus/parisc/devices/*/hw_type
> > /sys/bus/parisc/devices/32/hw_type:0x00
> > /sys/bus/parisc/devices/34/hw_type:0x00
>
> I don't have access to get this data however
On Monday 18 February 2008, Grant Grundler wrote:
> Runtime test for the hppa installer might be to scrounge in
> /sys/bus/parisc/devices for "hw_type" contains "0x00".
>
> e.g.:
> j6k:~# fgrep 0x00 /sys/bus/parisc/devices/*/hw_type
> /sys/bus/parisc/devices/32/hw_type:0x00
> /sys/bus/parisc/device
Grant Grundler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
<...>
> SMP would have been appropriate though. Installing SMP kernel is not
> a critical issue. Folks can easily figure out how to install an SMP
> kernel and SMP kernel might not be as stable for some configurations.
> So leaving that to the user is fi
On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 08:34:54PM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> We're starting the work for D-I Beta1 release and we would like ask to
> everyone to test the installer as much as possible, especially in not
> so common architectures where we receive less general testing.
Otavio
On Wed, Feb 6, 2008 at 6:56 AM, Gordon Farquharson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Installation on the Linksys NSLU2 will be broken until nslu2-utils
> 0.10+r71-14 [1] transitions into testing. This version of nslu2-utils
> is only required for DSFG installer images (i.e. no firmware) and for
> i
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 07:16:29AM -0600, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 06:04:24PM -0800, Brad Boyer wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 01:29:33PM -0600, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> > > Which initrd? cdrom and hd-media want a cd image. nativehd will download
> > > everything fro
On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 06:04:24PM -0800, Brad Boyer wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 01:29:33PM -0600, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 04:27:56AM -0800, Brad Boyer wrote:
> > > I did download and try to boot the m68k build of this installer. The
> >
> > Which initrd? cdrom an
On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 01:29:33PM -0600, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 04:27:56AM -0800, Brad Boyer wrote:
> > I did download and try to boot the m68k build of this installer. The
>
> Which initrd? cdrom and hd-media want a cd image. nativehd will download
> everything from t
On Monday 11 February 2008, Frans Pop wrote:
> hppa
> The first part of the installation runs fine, but I'm running into a
> weird failure at the start of partman. The failure seems to be not in
> partman itself, but in main-menu. I'm fairly sure that
> partman-base.postinst is never even started.
On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 04:27:56AM -0800, Brad Boyer wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 03:04:31PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> > On Tuesday 05 February 2008, Eugen Paiuc wrote:
> > > Good news , m68k is reentered in d-i !
> >
> > Well, the building of the daily D-I images has never really been disabl
On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 03:04:31PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Tuesday 05 February 2008, Eugen Paiuc wrote:
> > Good news , m68k is reentered in d-i !
>
> Well, the building of the daily D-I images has never really been disabled as
> far as I know.
>
> > But
> > http://cdimage.debian.org/cdima
On Monday 04 February 2008, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> We're starting the work for D-I Beta1 release and we would like ask to
> everyone to test the installer as much as possible, especially in not
> so common architectures where we receive less general testing.
I have run netboo
Hello,
Just to mention that I've just tested the image with a USB braille
device, and it just works great :)
Samuel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi All
On Feb 4, 2008 3:34 PM, Otavio Salvador <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We're starting the work for D-I Beta1 release and we would like ask to
> everyone to test the installer as much as possible, especially in not
> so common architectures where we receive
On Tuesday 05 February 2008, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> What's the procedure for that? At the moment, sid is pretty broken for
> installation (we're far behind), but no reason not to start the process.
You need a local mirror and debian-cd.
I have scripts I use to make things easier for both, fee
On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 03:04:31PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Tuesday 05 February 2008, Eugen Paiuc wrote:
> > Good news , m68k is reentered in d-i !
>
> Well, the building of the daily D-I images has never really been disabled as
> far as I know.
>
> > But
> > http://cdimage.debian.org/cdima
On Tuesday 05 February 2008, Eugen Paiuc wrote:
> Good news , m68k is reentered in d-i !
Well, the building of the daily D-I images has never really been disabled as
far as I know.
> But
> http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/daily/arch-latest/m68k/iso
>-cd/
>
> are forbidden for user
Hi
Good news , m68k is reentered in d-i !
But
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/daily/arch-latest/m68k/iso-cd/
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/daily/arch-latest/m68k/jigdo-cd/
are forbidden for users (temporary I hope ).
regards, --ee
--
To UNSUBSCRI
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
We're starting the work for D-I Beta1 release and we would like ask to
everyone to test the installer as much as possible, especially in not
so common architectures where we receive less general testing.
In the current timeline, we will
39 matches
Mail list logo
