Re: Current EEPRO100 Driver in boot-floppies

2003-01-10 Thread Fabrice Lorrain (home)
Eduard Bloch a écrit: #include * Adam Di Carlo [Thu, Jan 09 2003, 09:59:14AM]: 2. http://support.intel.com/support/network/adapter/index.htm As for the issue of the shipped EEPro, are you using the bf2.4 to boot with or no? This seems like an issue with the stable kernel-source-* package.

Re: Current EEPRO100 Driver in boot-floppies

2003-01-09 Thread Bob Proulx
Adam DiCarlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-01-09 09:59:14 -0600]: > As for the issue of the shipped EEPro, are you using the bf2.4 to boot > with or no? This seems like an issue with the stable kernel-source-* > package. It would seem like an issue for upstream more than for a downstream package. Ha

Re: Current EEPRO100 Driver in boot-floppies

2003-01-09 Thread Eduard Bloch
#include * Adam Di Carlo [Thu, Jan 09 2003, 09:59:14AM]: > > 2. http://support.intel.com/support/network/adapter/index.htm > > As for the issue of the shipped EEPro, are you using the bf2.4 to boot > with or no? This seems like an issue with the stable kernel-source-* > package. There is hope -

Re: Current EEPRO100 Driver in boot-floppies

2003-01-09 Thread Adam DiCarlo
CCS Crew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The driver in the boot-floppies images for the eepro100 seems to be > out-of-date and broken. The problem is characterized by the NIC's > failure to respond after minimal usage. Intel (and newer drivers for > the NIC) offers a working driver for Linux that I

Current EEPRO100 Driver in boot-floppies

2003-01-01 Thread CCS Crew
The driver in the boot-floppies images for the eepro100 seems to be out-of-date and broken. The problem is characterized by the NIC's failure to respond after minimal usage. Intel (and newer drivers for the NIC) offers a working driver for Linux that I have successfully tested under Slackware 7.1.