Quoting Jean-Michel POURE ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> The only critic about this ISO definition is that it does not make a clear
> difference between traditionnal Chinese and simplified Chinese.
Well, this is another debate : I have the feeling that both languages
should rather have different ISO (63
Christian Perrier wrote:
> (please followup to -boot)
>
> Quoting John Hasler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > Why not just say 'Area'?
> >
> > Like this:
> >
> > /---[Choose area]\
> > | Based on your language, you are probably in one of these |
> >
> > /---[Choose area]\
> > | Based on your language, you are probably in one of these |
> > | areas. If you are elsewhere, choose "other". |
>
> This is a good suggestion though I fear a bit that the main menu would
> then beco
>"Country or area" is maybe the best possibility which comes to my mind.
I think an alternative suggestion worth considering instead is 'Residence'.
Peter.
(please followup to -boot)
Quoting John Hasler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Why not just say 'Area'?
>
> Like this:
>
> /---[Choose area]\
> | Based on your language, you are probably in one of these |
> | areas. If you are elsewhere, choose "
5 matches
Mail list logo
