Bug#939585: installation-reports: confirmed with current installer

On Fri, 23 Apr 2021, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Please share the installer's syslog (/var/log/installer), preferably > compressed due to mail size limits. Not available anymore, I trashed the whole system. My guess is - why it worked on second run - is that one has to activate LVM otherwise it does

Processed: Re: Bug#939585: installation-reports: confirmed with current installer

Processing control commands: > tag -1 moreinfo Bug #939585 [installation-reports] installation-reports: Unable to boot from LVM on encrypted volume - missing cryptsetup in initramfs Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 939585: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=939585 Debian Bug Tracking Sy

Bug#939585: installation-reports: confirmed with current installer

Control: tag -1 moreinfo Norbert Preining (2021-04-01): > Same has happened on my system today, with a very recent installer. Please share the installer's syslog (/var/log/installer), preferably compressed due to mail size limits. Cheers, -- Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)

Bug#939585: installation-reports: confirmed with current installer

Package: installation-reports Followup-For: Bug #939585 Same has happened on my system today, with a very recent installer.

Bug#932939: Confirmed bug 932939

Just writing to confirm the same behaviour with a Supermicro X10SRL-F. main-menu segfaults at the beginning of d-i just after ethdetect runs and before a network interface is configured. Changing PXE console kernel boot options from: console=tty0 console=ttyS0,115200n8 to: console=ttyS0,

Re: Bug#734717: tasksel not installing task--desktop - confirmed

Version: 3.53 Holger Wansing wrote: > I tested this with buster alpha5 netinst image, and I can confirm this: > tasksel does not install the packages which are listed (those are Recommends) > in task-german-desktop task (anymore?). > > > I did two test installs: > 1. install standard and lxde

Bug#932939: Confirmed bug 932939

On 10/1/19 5:23 AM, Jeff wrote: > Confirmed the same. > > Sep 30 23:40:50 debconf: Setting debconf/language to en > Sep 30 23:40:50 kernel: [ 140.827798] main-menu[16157]: segfault at 1 > ip 7f2eeec81554 sp 7ffdd0809cc8 error 4 in > libc.so.6[7f2eeec11000+148000] > S

Bug#932939: Confirmed bug 932939

Confirmed the same. Sep 30 23:40:50 debconf: Setting debconf/language to en Sep 30 23:40:50 kernel: [ 140.827798] main-menu[16157]: segfault at 1 ip 7f2eeec81554 sp 7ffdd0809cc8 error 4 in libc.so.6[7f2eeec11000+148000] Sep 30 23:40:50 kernel: [ 140.827811] Code: 1f 80 00 00 00 00 66 0f

Processed: Re: tasksel not installing task--desktop - confirmed

Processing control commands: > tags -1 + confirmed Bug #734717 [tasksel] tasksel not installing task--desktop Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 734717: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=734717 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#734717: tasksel not installing task--desktop - confirmed

Control: tags -1 + confirmed Using the correct syntax for tagging -- Holger Wansing PGP-Fingerprint: 496A C6E8 1442 4B34 8508 3529 59F1 87CA 156E B076

Bug#734717: tasksel not installing task--desktop - confirmed

tags -1 confirmed Manuel Lorenzo wrote on 2014-01-09: > Installed the base system, upgraded to Sid and run Tasksel to install > the desktop task. > Previously, during the system installation process, Debian was > configured to use Spanish and once rebooted Gnome was shown in > S

Bug#834373: Bug Confirmed

Testing the 9.3.0 build, using LVM. AFAICS: * it's doing the LVM setup first * then checking to see if we should do UEFI * that's triggering the UEFI check - there *will* be an ESP but it's not been tagged as such yet it bails out part-way after the LVM init. logs shortly. -- Steve McInt

Bug#810538: confirmed for non-UTF-8 locale

Hi Cristian, i can confirm with console-setup 1.136. While trying to generate english output i ran LANG=C apt-get dist-upgrade and i saw lots and lots of those messages. Wide character (U+17F) in pattern match (m//) at /usr/bin/ckbcomp line 3847. Wide character (U+1E9E) in pattern match (m//)

Bug#766459: confirmed

Hi Cyril, On Donnerstag, 23. Oktober 2014, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > That's correct, I've updated the wheezy branch accordingly. Feel free to > give it a shot to make sure it works fine in your environment. I've reviewed the wheezy branch and the change looks sane to me. Thanks for fixing this in

Processed: Re: confirmed

Processing control commands: > found -1 1.0.48 Bug #766459 {Done: Holger Levsen } [debootstrap] debootstrap: should not try to configure base-files before /etc/passwd has the usual users in a Debian system Marked as found in versions debootstrap/1.0.48 and reopened. > fixed -1 1.0.56 Bug #766459

Bug#766459: confirmed

Control: found -1 1.0.48 Control: fixed -1 1.0.56 Holger Levsen (2014-10-23): > control: found -1 1.0.48+deb7u1 > control: notfound -1 1.0.60~bpo70+1 > control: notfound -1 1.0.56 Doesn't work with a mail to -done@… > I can confirm that the problem is gone with debootstrap from > wheezy-backpor

Bug#759737: confirmed here

Hi, I am biten by exactly the same issue here. I need a way to preseed that the 'default' disk (there is only one in my case, network install) which is obviously detected correctly, is used for physical as well as virtual hardware (/dev/sda respectively /dev/vda). Best regards, Andi

Processed: confirmed

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 653513 +confirmed Bug #653513 [debian-installer] debian-installer: build/README lies, code says: USE_UDEBS_FROM ?= unstable Added tag(s) confirmed. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. --

Bug#653513: confirmed

tags 653513 +confirmed thanks Hi, h01ger: 653513 still here cheers, Holger signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Bug#618010: Workaround confirmed

I can confirm the workaround Ed proposed: 1) before installation, I disabled WLAN in the BIOS settings, 2) installation of Debian with before mentioned Netinstall CD was successful, updates via ethernet/dhcp connection are possible 3) after installation, switch on WLAN in the BIOS and install b

Re: Confirmed

On Sat, 2012-06-16 at 03:18 +0300, Touko Korpela wrote: > On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 11:36:42PM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote: > > Thank you also for applying the fix David, although it would be nice > > to watch credits in the future. > > It would also have been nice to upload a new version focusing

Re: Confirmed

On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 11:36:42PM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote: > Thank you for the fix Milan. I verified that 0.9.6 fixes the problem > on my testing install. However, this report shouldn't have been > downgraded. > > Thank you also for applying the fix David, although it would be nice > to wat

Confirmed

Thank you for the fix Milan. I verified that 0.9.6 fixes the problem on my testing install. However, this report shouldn't have been downgraded. Thank you also for applying the fix David, although it would be nice to watch credits in the future. It would also have been nice to upload a new vers

Bug#650819: Confirmed, serious

On 2012-04-05 08:16, Touko Korpela wrote: On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 07:58:17PM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote: severity 650819 serious tags 650819 + confirmed patch retitle 650819 GRUB entries (grub.cfg) sometimes lacking other operating systems, particularly installing 686 or amd64 images (i386

Bug#650819: Confirmed, serious

On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 07:58:17PM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote: > severity 650819 serious > tags 650819 + confirmed patch > retitle 650819 GRUB entries (grub.cfg) sometimes lacking other > operating systems, particularly installing 686 or amd64 images > (i386) > reassign 6508

Bug#650819: Confirmed, serious

severity 650819 serious tags 650819 + confirmed patch retitle 650819 GRUB entries (grub.cfg) sometimes lacking other operating systems, particularly installing 686 or amd64 images (i386) reassign 650819 os-prober, grub-common thanks I have to confirm this. I was hit by this when installing

Bug#655437: Confirmed

tags 655437 + confirmed thanks I have to confirm this. This (the problem reported by Martin) is particularly confusing when several flavours are possible. On a x86-64 system, I get this: Mar 29 15:53:14 base-installer: info: kernel linux-image-686-pae usable on 686-pae 686-bigmem amd64 686

Processed: Re: Bug#450895: Confirmed for version 1.10.2 as well

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 450895 https://bugs.busybox.net/show_bug.cgi?id=3469 Bug #450895 [busybox] busybox: 'mount --rbind' fails to recursively mount submounts Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://bugs.busybox.net/show_bug.cgi?id=3469'. > found 450895 1:1

Bug#614127: confirmed on allmachines: painfull

Julien Cristau, le Fri 25 Feb 2011 18:44:22 +0100, a écrit : > Why "at best"? It sounds like checking whether the active VT is in > KD_TEXT is exactly what's needed here. No, because that may just be an fbterm, still using the normal keyboard processing, and not Xorg. Samuel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE

Bug#614127: confirmed on allmachines: painfull

Julien Cristau, le Sat 26 Feb 2011 01:18:27 +0100, a écrit : > On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 01:15:33 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > > Julien Cristau, le Fri 25 Feb 2011 18:44:22 +0100, a écrit : > > > Why "at best"? It sounds like checking whether the active VT is in > > > KD_TEXT is exactly what's

Bug#614127: confirmed on allmachines: painfull

On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 01:15:33 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Julien Cristau, le Fri 25 Feb 2011 18:44:22 +0100, a écrit : > > Why "at best"? It sounds like checking whether the active VT is in > > KD_TEXT is exactly what's needed here. > > No, because that may just be an fbterm, still using

Bug#614127: confirmed on allmachines: painfull

On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 20:20:47 +0200, Anton Zinoviev wrote: > On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 06:44:22PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > > > > Why "at best"? It sounds like checking whether the active VT is in > > KD_TEXT is exactly what's needed here. > > How can this be tested? > Something like this

Bug#614127: confirmed on allmachines: painfull

On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 06:44:22PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > > Why "at best"? It sounds like checking whether the active VT is in > KD_TEXT is exactly what's needed here. How can this be tested? Anton Zinoviev -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subj

Bug#614127: confirmed on allmachines: painfull

On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 14:05:07 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Otavio Salvador, le Fri 25 Feb 2011 13:01:59 +, a écrit : > > if pidof X > /dev/null; then > > echo "X is running" > > else > > echo "X isn't running" > > fi > > Errr, surely not :) > > What Anton wants is to know wheth

Bug#614127: confirmed on allmachines: painfull

On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 07:30:53PM +0200, Anton Zinoviev wrote: > On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 12:23:27PM -0500, Lennart Sorensen wrote: > > > > Is 'fgconsole' of any help if one could combine it with knowing which > > vt's have X currently running? > > Indeed! Probably linux only though. -- Len So

Bug#614127: confirmed on allmachines: painfull

On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 12:23:27PM -0500, Lennart Sorensen wrote: > > Is 'fgconsole' of any help if one could combine it with knowing which > vt's have X currently running? Indeed! Anton Zinoviev -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe

Bug#614127: confirmed on allmachines: painfull

On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 06:00:43PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Anton Zinoviev (25/02/2011): > > Testing the standard output and standard input never worked because > > they are redirected by Debconf. In particular /usr/bin/tty outputs > > "not a tty". For a long time the following code worke

Bug#614127: confirmed on allmachines: painfull

Hi, Anton Zinoviev (25/02/2011): > Testing the standard output and standard input never worked because > they are redirected by Debconf. In particular /usr/bin/tty outputs > "not a tty". For a long time the following code worked: > > case `readlink /proc/self/fd/2` in > /dev/tty[0-

Bug#614127: confirmed on allmachines: painfull

On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 02:05:07PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > What Anton wants is to know whether X is currently at the front or not. > And you can't rely on DISPLAY being set (since you could be from sudo su > -), and you can't rely on stdin being the VT (since you could be from > screen).

Bug#614127: confirmed on allmachines: painfull

On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 13:05, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Otavio Salvador, le Fri 25 Feb 2011 13:01:59 +, a écrit : >> if pidof X > /dev/null; then >>     echo "X is running" >> else >>     echo "X isn't running" >> fi > > Errr, surely not :) heh. > What Anton wants is to know whether X is cur

Bug#614127: confirmed on allmachines: painfull

Otavio Salvador, le Fri 25 Feb 2011 13:01:59 +, a écrit : > if pidof X > /dev/null; then > echo "X is running" > else > echo "X isn't running" > fi Errr, surely not :) What Anton wants is to know whether X is currently at the front or not. And you can't rely on DISPLAY being set (sinc

Bug#614127: confirmed on allmachines: painfull

On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 00:20, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Anton Zinoviev, le Thu 24 Feb 2011 07:28:18 +0200, a écrit : >> True.  Other people have complained about this too.  Unfortunately I >> don't know a reliable way to test whether we are on the console or in X >> and it is generally dangerous t

Bug#614127: confirmed on allmachines: painfull

Anton Zinoviev, le Thu 24 Feb 2011 07:28:18 +0200, a écrit : > True. Other people have complained about this too. Unfortunately I > don't know a reliable way to test whether we are on the console or in X > and it is generally dangerous to reconfigure the console if X is active. Maybe dpkg-reco

Bug#614127: confirmed on allmachines: painfull

On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 10:57:05PM -0600, Javier Vasquez wrote: > > Found the issue with the failure, but I don't like the solution, :-) > One of the things keyboard-configuration doesn't ask, is whether there > are alternative languages to the primary ones, I suppose this is not going to change b

Bug#614127: confirmed on allmachines: painfull

On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 10:50 PM, Anton Zinoviev wrote: > reassign 614127 console-setup > severity 614127 normal > forcemerge 614550 614127 > thanks > > On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 09:35:42PM -0600, Javier Vasquez wrote: >> >> Package: console-setup >> Version: 1.69 >> >> Package: xkb-data >> Version:

Processed: Re: Bug#614127: confirmed on allmachines: painfull

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 614127 console-setup Bug #614127 [console-data] keyboard layout doesn't keep after reboot Bug reassigned from package 'console-data' to 'console-setup'. Bug No longer marked as found in versions console-data/2:1.10-9. > severity 614127 no

Processed: Bug confirmed

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tag 607766 +confirmed Bug #607766 [netcfg] Fails to configure WEP wireless network without DHCP Added tag(s) confirmed. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 607766: http://bugs.debian.org/c

Bug#607766: Bug confirmed

tag 607766 +confirmed thanks Just a quick note to indicate that I have, indeed, confirmed this bug, and it's quite easy to reproduce -- just turn off your DHCP server, setup your wireless NIC, then try and do anything with it. More investigation will be carried out into WTF is actually goi

Bug#607480: confirmed

Confirmed: same behaviour on eeePC 1215P -- Paolo Cavallini: http://www.faunalia.it/pc -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4d13208e.1080...@faunalia.it

Bug#596762: installer failed to add winXP to grub2: confirmed with beta2

  Today I tested a beta2 netinst cd installation on a system with an already existing windows xp. The installation went fine so far, including: - win32-loader to start the debian-installer in graphical mode - resize of the ntfs partition   Regarding bootloader installation: I was told that windows

Bug#587150: #587150: d-i netinst cd doesn't boot, isolinux error - Confirmed as fixed

Hello, Ferenc Wagner wrote: > This particular bug is fixed in Syslinux 4.00 final, which is already in > unstable. Other two very similar bugs were only fixed in 4.01-pre1, > which isn't packaged yet. I can confirm, that this bug ISOLINUX 4.00 debian-20100624 ETCD Copyright ...

Bug#450895: Confirmed for version 1.10.2 as well

I can confirm this bug on Maemo 5 which is derived from Debian, package version: BusyBox v1.10.2 (Debian 3:1.10.2.legal-1osso26+0m5) multi-call binary This probably is an upstream bug, though. -- *** Powered by AudioScrobbler --> http://www.last.fm/user/Interneci/ *** 18:37 | Epica - Deconstru

Bug#529862: [console-setup] Confirmed in intel graphics card

On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 09:50:13PM +0100, Rafael Belmonte wrote: > Package: console-setup > Version: 1.51 > > I can confirm this bug in an Intel graphics card, using > xserver-xorg-video- intel driver. I need to run dpkg-reconfigure > console-setup or setupcon each time I log into tty session. I

Bug#529862: [console-setup] Confirmed in intel graphics card

On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 09:50:13PM +0100, Rafael Belmonte wrote: > > I can confirm this bug in an Intel graphics card, using xserver-xorg-video- > intel driver. Does this problem exist if you reboot the machine? Are you using the new version of xserver-xorg-video-intel from Debian unstable? Th

Bug#566316: Confirmed

I'm seeing this too. The trigger appears to be a dev/cciss/c0d0 block device combined with existing lvm partitions. -Bruce

Bug#529862: [console-setup] Confirmed in intel graphics card

Package: console-setup Version: 1.51 I can confirm this bug in an Intel graphics card, using xserver-xorg-video- intel driver. I need to run dpkg-reconfigure console-setup or setupcon each time I log into tty session. I remember that this was a tipical bug in Ubuntu some releases ago, now it is

Bug#545933: Confirmed with netinst daily built from 2009-11-28

Hi all, I ran into the same problem today, with Image version: http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/daily/arch-latest/amd64/iso-cd/debian-testing-amd64-netinst.iso from 20091128-11:21 Greetings, Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subje

Bug#265912: No Tornadoes Confirmed In Nebraskaa-Kansas Area Thiis Year

Snowdrifts the arctic moss shows green and yellow, 'this one is the charioteer of the name of matali. Settled. The judge smiles with pleasure he does cottage, the old woman suggested that he be carried in the town, some time previous to the birth of.

Bug#405484: Confirmed: Etch installs on fakeraid

A million thanks to Steve - I managed to complete my install a few weeks ago using steps 1-4 outlined in my second post (9 Jan), and then the following steps of Steve's: - Skipped over the failing lilo, let it finish and eject the CD, flipped over to VT2 to finish the install by hand. (I'm not su

Re: Announcement for mr-IN translations for D-I (confirmed)

Christian,Please confirm me as formal coordinator for D-I in mr-IN, though I am not sure about backup coordinator and team of translators at this point of time. As soon as I get the team of translators and one coordinator out of them I'll let you know.RegardsPriti PatilOn 6/29/06, Christian Perrier

Bug#289843: Bogus confirmed

This bug is bogus - problem was the result of a faulty memory stick. Deepest apologies for wasting your time. /JS

Bug#276076: Patch confirmed working

The following line in languagelist is confirmed working. I get a correct Hebrew display in 2nd stage and installed system. Hebrew;he_IL;he_IL;he;IL;he_IL:he:en_GB:en;kbd=LatArCyrHeb-16(iso08) -- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe"

Bug#231756: FQDN without dhcp confirmed

> The debian installer should have set your hostname to a fully qualified one, > so this should work. Please confirm. I tested this with d-i beta3, I can confirm it works for the non-dhcp case. /etc/hosts has a FQDN and the hostname as alias. Calling hostname --fqdn works ok. This bug can probab

Re: Bug#120637: confirmed, plus line truncation in dbootstrap

On Thu, Nov 22, 2001 at 11:21:18PM +, Philip Blundell wrote: > In message , Claus Hindsgaul writes: > > Install=E9r kerne og moduler > > > >is truncated to: > > > > Install > > > >Which really doesn't tell an awful lot :-) > > This is normally a symptom of n

Re: Bug#120637: confirmed, plus line truncation in dbootstrap

In message , Claus Hindsgaul writes: > Install=E9r kerne og moduler > >is truncated to: > > Install > >Which really doesn't tell an awful lot :-) This is normally a symptom of not running dbootstrap with the right locale. I'm not sure what happens if you use i1

Bug#120637: confirmed, plus line truncation in dbootstrap

torsdag den 22. november 2001 16:13 skrev Jesus Climent: > The system boots normally with rescue/root disks. After asking for a language to proceed with the installation it fails with the error message: > > --Problem-- > An error occured while loading application messages. > Also seen here (la