Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Is it packaged anywhere now?
> >
> > Yes, install-doc.
>
> Are you talking CVS version? As far as I look into debian archive, I
> see install-doc as a part of boot-floppies source tree and install-doc
> is only a binary package name. (I think Josip i
On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 01:41:20PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 11:02:24AM +0100, Pierre Machard wrote:
> > Do you intend to add faq such as webwml/security/faq.wml inside
> > ddp/manuals.sgml/faq ?
> >
> > More generaly each faq include in the webwml module ?
>
> That's 1
On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 11:02:24AM +0100, Pierre Machard wrote:
> Do you intend to add faq such as webwml/security/faq.wml inside
> ddp/manuals.sgml/faq ?
>
> More generaly each faq include in the webwml module ?
That's 1) another module 2) another format. I don't know, but that looks
like it's
Hello,
On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 04:15:47PM -0600, Adam DiCarlo wrote:
[...]
> What I would suggest doing as an alternative is to create a
> 'common-deb-data' CVS module, and via the CVS modules functionality,
> including this module with the various CVS modules that use it, e.g.,
> the FAQ etc. Th
On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 09:20:39PM -0600, Adam DiCarlo wrote:
> Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > (install-doc perhaps? Last I checked, install-doc was entirely
> > broken. :)
>
> Broken how? I don't see any serious bugs on that pkg. Doesn't seem
> broken to me.
There's one that's tag
On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 09:20:39PM -0600, Adam DiCarlo wrote:
> Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > > > If in the DDP CVS area, should it be packaged as well? I
> > > > > think it will need to be...
> > > >
> > > > It can be packaged from there too, I don't see how that would
> > > > ne
Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > > If in the DDP CVS area, should it be packaged as well? I think it will
> > > > need to be...
> > >
> > > It can be packaged from there too, I don't see how that would necessarily
> > > impede the packaging process.
> >
> > No, it's just more work
On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 04:15:47PM -0600, Adam DiCarlo wrote:
> > If it goes in with dpkg, then we have a whole new set of arrangements to
> > make with the dpkg developers in order to accept the document, to have
> > others work on it, translate it, etc. I'd very much like to avoid that.
>
> Well
Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If it goes in with dpkg, then we have a whole new set of arrangements to
> make with the dpkg developers in order to accept the document, to have
> others work on it, translate it, etc. I'd very much like to avoid that.
Well, it's actually far less work f
On Sat, Dec 07, 2002 at 07:08:20PM -0700, Chris Tillman wrote:
> > > Is anyone responsible for the rewrite of the install manual for d-i?
> > > I'd prefer not to take it since I'd like to put my attention on
> > > developers-reference, doc-base, and my bugs for a while...
> >
> > Chris Tillman did
On Sat, Dec 07, 2002 at 11:15:32PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > Is anyone responsible for the rewrite of the install manual for d-i?
> > I'd prefer not to take it since I'd like to put my attention on
> > developers-reference, doc-base, and my bugs for a while...
>
> Chris Tillman did the large a
On Sat, 2002-12-07 at 22:15, Josip Rodin wrote:
*snip*
> > > The situation is similar with the release notes, which just need a few
> > > tags to be able to skip some info for architectures recently released.
> >
> > Yes, ditto.
Great. Having the release notes in b-f cvs always seemed illogical
On Sat, Dec 07, 2002 at 04:02:18PM -0600, Adam DiCarlo wrote:
> > The dselect beginners guide is the one document in the b-f CVS tree that
> > _really_ doesn't belong there: if you remove the dependencies on the b-f
> > files from the header, you'll notice just a few missing tags, none of which
> >
Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The dselect beginners guide is the one document in the b-f CVS tree that
> _really_ doesn't belong there: if you remove the dependencies on the b-f
> files from the header, you'll notice just a few missing tags, none of which
> are even borderline importan
Hi,
The dselect beginners guide is the one document in the b-f CVS tree that
_really_ doesn't belong there: if you remove the dependencies on the b-f
files from the header, you'll notice just a few missing tags, none of which
are even borderline important to the document itself, and all of them
tr
15 matches
Mail list logo
