Re: Bug#948695: buster-pu: package openssh/1:7.9p1-10+deb10u2

2020-02-02 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Hi, Adam D. Barratt (2020-01-31): > Given how close we are to the freeze for 10.3, feel free to upload and > we'll hold the package in stable-new until KiBi has chance to check it. Given the changelog entry (and given I'm not usually testing openssh support inside d-i anyway, so I don't have any

Re: Bug#948695: buster-pu: package openssh/1:7.9p1-10+deb10u2

2020-01-31 Thread Colin Watson
On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 06:49:12PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Sat, 2020-01-18 at 19:49 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > That looks fine to me, thanks (modulo the changelog being finalised), > > but will need a d-i ack due to the udebs; tagging and CCing. > > Given how close we are to the

Re: Bug#948695: buster-pu: package openssh/1:7.9p1-10+deb10u2

2020-01-31 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sat, 2020-01-18 at 19:49 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Control: tags -1 + confirmed d-i > > On Sun, 2020-01-12 at 00:24 +, Colin Watson wrote: > > https://bugs.debian.org/946242 reports an OpenSSH regression on old > > kernels on certain architectures (e.g. i386) prompted by the > > inter

Re: Bug#948695: buster-pu: package openssh/1:7.9p1-10+deb10u2

2020-01-18 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + confirmed d-i On Sun, 2020-01-12 at 00:24 +, Colin Watson wrote: > https://bugs.debian.org/946242 reports an OpenSSH regression on old > kernels on certain architectures (e.g. i386) prompted by the > interaction between an OpenSSL update and a seccomp filter. It's > essenti