Hi,
Simon McVittie (2019-11-09):
> Uploaded. The only change outside debian/changelog was to add the correct
> branch to the Vcs-Git field.
>
> I've tested this successfully in a buster GNOME VM where I was previously
> able to reproduce #941018.
I have spent time trying to get d-i tested using
On Fri, 08 Nov 2019 at 19:52:05 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Wed, 2019-11-06 at 12:08 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On 2019-11-04 19:12, Simon McVittie wrote:
> > > A recent security fix to ibus (CVE-2019-14822, #940267, DSA-4525-1)
> > > exposed an interoperability bug between GLib's imp
On Wed, 2019-11-06 at 12:08 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + confirmed d-i
>
> On 2019-11-04 19:12, Simon McVittie wrote:
> > A recent security fix to ibus (CVE-2019-14822, #940267, DSA-4525-1)
> > exposed an interoperability bug between GLib's implementation of D-
> > Bus
> > an
On Wed, 06 Nov 2019 at 12:08:47 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On 2019-11-04 19:12, Simon McVittie wrote:
> > A recent security fix to ibus (CVE-2019-14822, #940267, DSA-4525-1)
> > exposed an interoperability bug between GLib's implementation of D-Bus
> > and the reference implementation libdbus
Control: tags -1 + confirmed d-i
On 2019-11-04 19:12, Simon McVittie wrote:
A recent security fix to ibus (CVE-2019-14822, #940267, DSA-4525-1)
exposed an interoperability bug between GLib's implementation of D-Bus
and the reference implementation libdbus (#941018). The practical
impact
is tha
5 matches
Mail list logo
