Adam D. Barratt (2019-03-26):
> As I mentioned on IRC, we can't "push it into stretch" without a point
> release, and the whole point of this exercise was to avoid having to
> schedule another short-notice point release.
FTAOD: That's exactly in line with what I think I tried to convey over
the l
On Tue, 2019-03-26 at 10:39 -0700, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> On 2019-03-26, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On 2019-03-15 06:44, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > The updated images for armhf have been available in p-u for a
> > > couple of
> > > days now.
> > >
> > > Feedback would be appreciated, as we w
On 2019-03-26, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On 2019-03-15 06:44, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>> The updated images for armhf have been available in p-u for a couple of
>> days now.
>>
>> Feedback would be appreciated, as we would like to be able to accept
>> the new kernel upload into p-u, which will block
On 2019-03-15 06:44, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
The updated images for armhf have been available in p-u for a couple of
days now.
Feedback would be appreciated, as we would like to be able to accept
the new kernel upload into p-u, which will block a further rebuild here
as it brings an ABI bump. (Th
Hello Adam,
On 15/03/2019 07:44, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Feedback would be appreciated
I used the following two files to construct an installer SD card:
http://ftp.nl.debian.org/debian/dists/stretch-proposed-updates/main/installer-armhf/20170615+deb9u5+b3/images/netboot/SD-card-images/firmware.
On Sun, 2019-03-10 at 09:51 -0700, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> On 2019-03-10, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > Vagrant Cascadian (2019-03-09):
> > > > > Thanks for your report; that's known and fixed on the kernel
> > > > > side
> > > > > already; how to deal with d-i is discussed in:
> > > > > https:/
On 2019-03-10, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Vagrant Cascadian (2019-03-09):
>> >> Thanks for your report; that's known and fixed on the kernel side
>> >> already; how to deal with d-i is discussed in:
>> >> https://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2019/03/msg00165.html
>> >>
>> >> Currently waiting on s
Heya,
Vagrant Cascadian (2019-03-09):
> I can also confirm that simply replacing the broken kernel with the one
> from stretch-updates works for the netboot image.
>
>
> >> Thanks for your report; that's known and fixed on the kernel side
> >> already; how to deal with d-i is discussed in:
> >>
On 2019-03-09, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> On 2019-03-09, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>> Peter Lebbing (2019-03-09):
>>> Debian kernel bug #922478 renders armhf systems unbootable. This bug was
>>> fixed, but the debian-installer images still use (I presume) kernel
>>> version 4.9.144-3, the unbootable
On 2019-03-09, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Peter Lebbing (2019-03-09):
>> Debian kernel bug #922478 renders armhf systems unbootable. This bug was
>> fixed, but the debian-installer images still use (I presume) kernel
>> version 4.9.144-3, the unbootable version. I noticed this today while
>> trying
Hi Peter,
Peter Lebbing (2019-03-09):
> Package: debian-installer
> Version: 20170615+deb9u5+b2
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> Dear maintainers,
>
> Debian kernel bug #922478 renders armhf systems unbootable. This bug was
> fixed, but the debian-installer images
Package: debian-installer
Version: 20170615+deb9u5+b2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Dear maintainers,
Debian kernel bug #922478 renders armhf systems unbootable. This bug was
fixed, but the debian-installer images still use (I presume) kernel
version 4.9.144-3, the unboo
12 matches
Mail list logo
