> "Ivo" == Ivo De Decker writes:
Ivo> Hi, Given that there is still discussion about the impact of
Ivo> merged /usr at this very late point of the freeze, I think
Ivo> having merged /usr by default for new installations should be
Ivo> reconsidered.
What discussion are you see
Hi,
Given that there is still discussion about the impact of merged /usr at this
very late point of the freeze, I think having merged /usr by default for new
installations should be reconsidered.
On Sun, May 19, 2019 at 07:22:08AM -0400, Sam Hartman wrote:
> I've been debating doing this, but con
On Sun, May 19, 2019 at 07:22:08AM -0400, Sam Hartman wrote:
> > "Ian" == Ian Jackson writes:
>
> Ian> (sending this because I got the release team address wrong) Ian
> Ian> Jackson writes ("That merged-usr is mandatory is RC"):
> >> In #923091, Guillem (with dpkg maintainer hat o
> "Ian" == Ian Jackson writes:
Ian> (sending this because I got the release team address wrong) Ian
Ian> Jackson writes ("That merged-usr is mandatory is RC"):
>> Control: severity -1 serious
>>
>> In #923091, Guillem (with dpkg maintainer hat on) asks for a
>> base-i
On Mon, 2019-05-13 at 17:24:55 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 11:22:35AM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > In #923091, Guillem (with dpkg maintainer hat on) asks for a
> > base-installer option to allow installing buster without merged-usr.
>
> No, he did not mention dpkg.
Inde
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 wishlist
Bug #923091 [base-installer] base-installer: Allow installing w/o the broken
merged-usr-via-symlinks
Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'serious'
--
923091: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=923091
Debian Bug Tracking System
Conta
Control: severity -1 wishlist
Hi Ian
On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 11:22:35AM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> In #923091, Guillem (with dpkg maintainer hat on) asks for a
> base-installer option to allow installing buster without merged-usr.
No, he did not mention dpkg. But as always, please provide a pa
(sending this because I got the release team address wrong)
Ian Jackson writes ("That merged-usr is mandatory is RC"):
> Control: severity -1 serious
>
> In #923091, Guillem (with dpkg maintainer hat on) asks for a
> base-installer option to allow installing buster without merged-usr.
>
> Guille
Control: severity -1 serious
In #923091, Guillem (with dpkg maintainer hat on) asks for a
base-installer option to allow installing buster without merged-usr.
Guillem filed the bug as `wishlist' but given the controversy it seems
to me that it should be RC if for no other reasons than social
cohe
9 matches
Mail list logo
