On Tue, 18 Apr 2017, Olliver Schinagl wrote:
> has its shebang set to /bin/sh, it would work with any posix shell, including
> posh.
Do note that posh is *not* a POSIX shell, nor suitable for /bin/sh on
Debian systems at all. It contains tons of bugs inherited from pdksh
which I had to fix in mks
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + patch
Bug #860545 [debootstrap] debootstrap fails to locate xzcat if the default
shell is set to posh
Added tag(s) patch.
--
860545: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=860545
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with pro
Control: tags -1 + patch
On 2017-04-18 15:57 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 04:33:55PM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
>>On 2017-04-18 14:52 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>>>
>>> Just tested this - it appears that posh doesn't include "type", which
>>> is what debootstrap is usi
On 2017-04-18 15:52 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-04-18 at 16:33 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
>> On 2017-04-18 14:52 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> >
>> > Just tested this - it appears that posh doesn't include "type", which
>> > is what debootstrap is using to check what's available.
On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 04:33:55PM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
>On 2017-04-18 14:52 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>>
>> Just tested this - it appears that posh doesn't include "type", which
>> is what debootstrap is using to check what's available. I don't
>> personally know if "type" is a hard requi
On Tue, 2017-04-18 at 16:33 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2017-04-18 14:52 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 01:44:52PM +0200, Olliver Schinagl wrote:
> > > Package: debootstrap
> > > Version: 1.0.89
> > > Severity: normal
> > >
> > > Dear Maintainer,
> > >
> > > Tryin
On Tue, 2017-04-18 at 14:52 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
[...]
> Just tested this - it appears that posh doesn't include "type", which
> is what debootstrap is using to check what's available. I don't
> personally know if "type" is a hard requirement in a posix shell
> here.
It is in the latest PO
On 2017-04-18 14:52 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 01:44:52PM +0200, Olliver Schinagl wrote:
>>Package: debootstrap
>>Version: 1.0.89
>>Severity: normal
>>
>>Dear Maintainer,
>>
>>Trying to run debootstrap with just acl (the first package in the list) fails
>>at unpacking d
On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 01:44:52PM +0200, Olliver Schinagl wrote:
>Package: debootstrap
>Version: 1.0.89
>Severity: normal
>
>Dear Maintainer,
>
>Trying to run debootstrap with just acl (the first package in the list) fails
>at unpacking due to a missing xzcat
>
>sudo debootstrap --merged-usr --v
Package: debootstrap
Version: 1.0.89
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
Trying to run debootstrap with just acl (the first package in the list) fails
at unpacking due to a missing xzcat
sudo debootstrap --merged-usr --variant=minbase --components=main,non-free
--include=acl jessie /tmp/debtest
10 matches
Mail list logo