TL;DR summary:
* For single user systems, use LUKS / dm-crypt.
* For multi-user systems, file system level encryption may make sense,
but a lot of the tools necessary to do user-friendly key management
for a traditional Unix desktop or server have not been implemented
yet. Ext4 encryption
On 6/25/2017 4:19 AM, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Marcos Mobley (2016-10-23):
>> it would be nice to be able to use EXT4's native file-system-level
>> encryption instead of LUKS.
>
> As far as I understand it, this would only protect the contents of a
> given directory instead of the whole filesyste
Control: tag -1 moreinfo
Hi Marcos,
Marcos Mobley (2016-10-23):
> it would be nice to be able to use EXT4's native file-system-level
> encryption instead of LUKS.
As far as I understand it, this would only protect the contents of a
given directory instead of the whole filesystem, so that doesn'
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 moreinfo
Bug #841842 [debian-installer] debian-installer: should use EXT4's native
file-system-level encryption
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
841842: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=841842
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.or
Package: debian-installer
Severity: wishlist
Dear Maintainer,
it would be nice to be able to use EXT4's native file-system-level encryption
instead of LUKS.
Thanks
-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500
5 matches
Mail list logo
