On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 02:07:31PM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> I understand your point for ppc64el, but since `yaboot` gets build on
> ppc64, some users may break their systems...
According to buildd, it fails to build on ppc64 (not surprising since
it requires 32bit static libraries to link
Hi Milan,
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 2:01 PM, Milan Kupcevic wrote:
> On 05/31/2016 04:35 AM, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
>> Here is the short explanation on why I played with the `pending` tag.
>> ,
>> Switching from yaboot to grub for d-i is a great news. However I
>> feared two things, with the curr
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 825110 + pending
Bug #825110 [partman-ext3] /pci@f40/ata-6@d/@0:3,/boot/vmlinux: Unknown or
corrupt
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #825110 to the same tags previously set
> unblock 825110 by 610206
Bug #825110 [partman-ext3] /pci@
tags 825110 + pending
unblock 825110 by 610206
thanks
On 05/31/2016 04:35 AM, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> Here is the short explanation on why I played with the `pending` tag.
> ,
> Switching from yaboot to grub for d-i is a great news. However I
> feared two things, with the current applied patch
Here is the short explanation on why I played with the `pending` tag.
,
Switching from yaboot to grub for d-i is a great news. However I
feared two things, with the current applied patch for #825110 we are
currently restricting users solely for yaboot user (I did not
understand why the switch was d
5 matches
Mail list logo
