On Dienstag, 11. November 2014, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Because d-i-n-i fetches d-i from the archive, and because you want a d-i
> that knows about the new linux ABI instead of the old one.
ah, thanks.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Holger Levsen (2014-11-11):
> > then think about uploading d-i (possibly including some more packages
> > for which unblock requests have been filed), then only d-i-n-i.
>
> why would you want to wait with uploading d-i-n-i until d-i has been uploaded?
Because d-i-n-i fetches d-i from the archiv
Hi,
On Montag, 10. November 2014, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> It'd probably a better idea to wait until src:linux migrates to testing,
ack
> then think about uploading d-i (possibly including some more packages
> for which unblock requests have been filed), then only d-i-n-i.
why would you want to
Holger Levsen (2014-11-10):
> Hi,
>
> On Dienstag, 28. Oktober 2014, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
> > It is; let's settle on "8" for the netboot images then; I'll re-upload
> > later today.
>
> This upload hasn't reached sid yet (and will still to go through NEW).
>
> I've spoken with Didier thi
Hi,
On Dienstag, 28. Oktober 2014, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
> It is; let's settle on "8" for the netboot images then; I'll re-upload
> later today.
This upload hasn't reached sid yet (and will still to go through NEW).
I've spoken with Didier this morning about it and he said he currently has
Le mardi, 28 octobre 2014, 14.43:50 Cyril Brulebois a écrit :
> Didier 'OdyX' Raboud (2014-10-28):
> > The main argument in favour of "x.0" versioning was the possibility
> > (see #682656) to co-install versions across multiple releases.
> > Dropping the major version number from the package name
Didier 'OdyX' Raboud (2014-10-28):
> As long as it's not out of NEW, we can still change our minds.
Still noise and/or work for ftpmasters who are already quite busy.
> The main argument in favour of "x.0" versioning was the possibility (see
> #682656) to co-install versions across multiple rel
Steven Chamberlain (2014-10-28):
> On 28/10/14 12:56, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > There was no hurry AFAICT.
> [...]
> > Since there were no 8.x uploads at all during the release cycle, [...]
>
> Selfishly I'm keen for the existing debian-installer-netboot-images
> packages to go away as soon as p
On 28/10/14 12:56, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> There was no hurry AFAICT.
[...]
> Since there were no 8.x uploads at all during the release cycle, [...]
Selfishly I'm keen for the existing debian-installer-netboot-images
packages to go away as soon as possible, as they're still Built-Using:
kfreebsd-
Le mardi, 28 octobre 2014, 13.56:33 Cyril Brulebois a écrit :
> Since there were no 8.x uploads at all during the release cycle, it
> might have been an opportunity to move away from X.0 versioning…
As long as it's not out of NEW, we can still change our minds.
The main argument in favour of "x.0
Didier 'OdyX' Raboud (2014-10-28):
> I've given more thought to this, and I think we should get d-i-n-i
> through NEW rather sooner than later (all binary package names get
> changed).
There was no hurry AFAICT.
Since there were no 8.x uploads at all during the release cycle, it might
have bee
On 28/10/14 08:07, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
> Le lundi, 27 octobre 2014, 11.57:33 Cyril Brulebois a écrit :
>> I understand the reasoning but I am not keen on moving files around at
>> this very late stage; if adding a symlink works, this would probably
>> be better.
Symlink sounds good to me;
Hi all,
Le lundi, 27 octobre 2014, 11.57:33 Cyril Brulebois a écrit :
> Didier 'OdyX' Raboud (2014-10-27):
> > Le lundi, 27 octobre 2014, 11.23:23 Cyril Brulebois a écrit :
> > > > * kfreebsd-amd64's images fetching logic fails because there is
> > > > no un-numbered /netboot/ directory under w
[ Cc: debian-bsd@ ]
Didier 'OdyX' Raboud (2014-10-27):
> Le lundi, 27 octobre 2014, 11.23:23 Cyril Brulebois a écrit :
> > > * kfreebsd-amd64's images fetching logic fails because there is no
> > > un-numbered /netboot/ directory under which we could automagically
> > > take "netboot.tar.gz"
Le lundi, 27 octobre 2014, 11.23:23 Cyril Brulebois a écrit :
> > * kfreebsd-amd64's images fetching logic fails because there is no
> > un-numbered /netboot/ directory under which we could automagically
> > take "netboot.tar.gz" as for other architectures. I think this
> > should be fixed in
Didier 'OdyX' Raboud (2014-10-27):
> Le lundi, 27 octobre 2014, 09.56:38 Petter Reinholdtsen a écrit :
> > Source: debian-installer-netboot-images
> > Version: 20130613+deb7u2.b3
> > Severity: important
> > User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
> > Usertags: debian-edu
> >
> > Hi. Will there be netb
Le lundi, 27 octobre 2014, 09.56:38 Petter Reinholdtsen a écrit :
> Source: debian-installer-netboot-images
> Version: 20130613+deb7u2.b3
> Severity: important
> User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: debian-edu
>
> Hi. Will there be netboot images for Debian Jessie (version 8)
> available
Petter Reinholdtsen (2014-10-27):
> Source: debian-installer-netboot-images
> Version: 20130613+deb7u2.b3
> Severity: important
> User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: debian-edu
>
> Hi. Will there be netboot images for Debian Jessie (version 8)
> available? We used the version 7 packag
Source: debian-installer-netboot-images
Version: 20130613+deb7u2.b3
Severity: important
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: debian-edu
Hi. Will there be netboot images for Debian Jessie (version 8)
available? We used the version 7 packages in Debian Edu Wheezy, and
miss the version 8 pa
19 matches
Mail list logo
