Cyril Brulebois (2015-04-01):
> Steve McIntyre (2015-04-01):
> > As it stands, this is only for removable media which people have not
> > already set up as part of their systems. The whole issue here is that
> > this is not useful any more. If anybody is relying on being able to
> > use such medi
On Wed, Apr 01, 2015 at 08:08:50PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>Steve McIntyre (2015-04-01):
>> As it stands, this is only for removable media which people have not
>> already set up as part of their systems. The whole issue here is that
>> this is not useful any more. If anybody is relying on b
Steve McIntyre (2015-04-01):
> As it stands, this is only for removable media which people have not
> already set up as part of their systems. The whole issue here is that
> this is not useful any more. If anybody is relying on being able to
> use such media without any of the existing auto-mounti
On Wed, Apr 01, 2015 at 07:20:02PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>Hi Steve,
>
>Steve McIntyre (2015-03-30):
>> Right, it seems that was too conservative and still left hd-media
>> devices listed. We probably don't want those either. Let's try this:
>> don't add *any* USB devices to /etc/fstab:
>
>
Hi Steve,
Steve McIntyre (2015-03-30):
> Right, it seems that was too conservative and still left hd-media
> devices listed. We probably don't want those either. Let's try this:
> don't add *any* USB devices to /etc/fstab:
Thanks. I'm slightly worried that some people might depend on this
featur
On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 11:21:08PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 11:45:40PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>>Steve McIntyre (2015-01-17):
>>> I'm thinking the best way to go with this is to simply drop this misc
>>> USB device support altogether from partman-target. Any obje
On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 11:45:40PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>Steve McIntyre (2015-01-17):
>> I'm thinking the best way to go with this is to simply drop this misc
>> USB device support altogether from partman-target. Any objections?
>
>Not from me.
OK, cool. Committing shortly. :-)
--
Stev
Steve McIntyre (2015-01-17):
> I'm thinking the best way to go with this is to simply drop this misc
> USB device support altogether from partman-target. Any objections?
Not from me.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 10:44:18 +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> I'm thinking the best way to go with this is to simply drop this misc
> USB device support altogether from partman-target. Any objections?
>
+1, fwiw.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sat, 17 Jan 2015 10:44:18 + Steve McIntyre
wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 09:38:05PM +0100, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> >
> >My personal opinion is that the right thing is to not add entries to
> >/etc/fstab for removable devices at all (where "removable" means
that
> >the device itself
On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 09:38:05PM +0100, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
>
>My personal opinion is that the right thing is to not add entries to
>/etc/fstab for removable devices at all (where "removable" means that
>the device itself can be removed, not just devices with removable
>media): I think there
Hi,
Gaudenz Steinlin writes:
> Just to give some context: This bug is about adding entries for USB mass
> storage devices to /etc/fstab on installation.
>
> Olliver Schinagl writes:
>> I just got bitten by this bug myself.
>>
>> As a long time gentoo + ubuntu user, I was baffled after getting th
Package: partman-target
Version: 91
Severity: normal
d-i adds entries like
/dev/sdb1 /media/usb0 auto rw,user,noauto 0 0
to /etc/fstab. These will then be used by udisks instead of the
default. This is problematic as they miss important options, such as
making vfat writable by the user.
I thi
13 matches
Mail list logo
