Bug#706659: Severity

2013-05-07 Thread Filipus Klutiero
On 2013-05-06 00:33, Ben Hutchings wrote: On Mon, 2013-05-06 at 00:01 -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote: severity 706659 normal thanks On 2013-05-05 21:29, Ben Hutchings wrote: On Sun, 2013-05-05 at 20:57 -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote: [...] Previously, you wrote: Therefore, the prompt is mislead

Bug#706659: Severity

2013-05-05 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Mon, 2013-05-06 at 00:01 -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote: > severity 706659 normal > thanks > > On 2013-05-05 21:29, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > On Sun, 2013-05-05 at 20:57 -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote: > > > Hi Ben, > > > could you explain why you changed this report's severity to wishlist? > > >

Bug#706659: Severity

2013-05-05 Thread Filipus Klutiero
severity 706659 normal thanks On 2013-05-05 21:29, Ben Hutchings wrote: On Sun, 2013-05-05 at 20:57 -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote: Hi Ben, could you explain why you changed this report's severity to wishlist? wishlist severity is designed for mere RFEs. This *is* a request for enhancement. I

Bug#706659: Severity

2013-05-05 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Sun, 2013-05-05 at 20:57 -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote: > Hi Ben, > could you explain why you changed this report's severity to wishlist? > wishlist severity is designed for mere RFEs. This *is* a request for enhancement. Previously, you wrote: > Therefore, the prompt is misleading and may cau

Bug#706659: Severity

2013-05-05 Thread Filipus Klutiero
Hi Ben, could you explain why you changed this report's severity to wishlist? wishlist severity is designed for mere RFEs. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.