Hi Adrian,
On 02.06.20 19:26, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Thanks for the quick changes and rebasing. I will have a look at your
> changes in detail later as I don't have much experience with the netcfg
> package.
It would be really great if you could have a look!
> I just realized one other
On 6/11/20 6:44 PM, Igor Scheller wrote:
> On 02.06.20 19:26, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
>> Thanks for the quick changes and rebasing. I will have a look at your
>> changes in detail later as I don't have much experience with the netcfg
>> package.
>
> It would be really great if you could ha
Hi Igor!
On 6/2/20 7:02 PM, Igor Scheller wrote:
> thank you for your suggestions, I implemented them (and rebased the
> branch on the current master).
Thanks for the quick changes and rebasing. I will have a look at your
changes in detail later as I don't have much experience with the netcfg
pack
Hi Adrian,
thank you for your suggestions, I implemented them (and rebased the
branch on the current master).
On 02.06.20 17:48, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Hi Igor!
>
> On 6/2/20 5:32 PM, Igor Scheller wrote:
>> Did I did something wrong with it?
>> Is it really so poorly written that no
Hi Igor!
On 6/2/20 5:32 PM, Igor Scheller wrote:
> Did I did something wrong with it?
> Is it really so poorly written that no one is even considering having a
> look at it?
> Is no body interested in fixing that (esp. as i'v heard from some people
> that they also need that feature)?
Two remarks:
Happy Birthday to you, happy Birthday to you, Happy Birthday little Pull
Request, Happy Birthday do uu!
As in happy second anniversary to this lonely PR that sadly gets ignored
by whoever has the right to merge it.
Did I did something wrong with it?
Is it really so poorly written that no one
Oh, and here is the patch File ;)
On 12.06.2018 13:49, Igor Scheller wrote:
> Hi,
> i created a merge request [1] that allows to preseed pointopoint
> connections so anyone can use a preseed file or boot parameters to
> define a pointopoint connection.
> -> If a pointopoint connection is preseeded
Hi,
i created a merge request [1] that allows to preseed pointopoint
connections so anyone can use a preseed file or boot parameters to
define a pointopoint connection.
-> If a pointopoint connection is preseeded it would be used.
Improvements / thoughts welcome!
Greets
Igor Scheller
[1] https:
On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 07:49:07AM +0100, Michael Neuffer wrote:
> >Well, it's only triggered for known point-to-point devices:
> >
> > if (strncmp(iface->name, "plip", 4) == 0
> > || strncmp(iface->name, "slip", 4) == 0
> > || strncmp(iface->
On Mon, Dec 03, 2012 at 11:57:43PM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 02, 2012 at 08:54:01PM +0100, Michael Neuffer wrote:
> > There already seems to be some code in static.c like the code below,
> > but it doesn't seem to be working
>
> Well, it's only triggered for known point-to-point dev
On Sun, Dec 02, 2012 at 08:54:01PM +0100, Michael Neuffer wrote:
> There already seems to be some code in static.c like the code below,
> but it doesn't seem to be working
Well, it's only triggered for known point-to-point devices:
if (strncmp(iface->name, "plip", 4) == 0
There already seems to be some code in static.c like the code below, but
it doesn't seem to be working
Manual configuration always only cycles through the following requests:
IP Address
Mask
Gateway
then it seems to try to configure the network and complains about an
unreachable gateway.
Ins
Package: netcfg
Severity: wishlist
Please add the possibility to specify pointopoint
routes when setting up the networking in the Debian Installer.
The result would look like something like this:
iface eth0 inet static
address a.b.c.d
netmask 255.255.255.255
gateway e.f.
13 matches
Mail list logo
