Bug#680084: duplicate or os-prober nmu? [Was: Bug#680084: nmu]

2012-11-14 Thread intrigeri
Hi, Michael Gilbert wrote (13 Nov 2012 00:09:04 GMT) : > On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 6:30 PM, Julien Cristau wrote: >> Isn't this bug just a dupe of 684293, in which case it doesn't need >> an os-prober change? > Possibly. I've never been able to reproduce the issue myself, so > deferring to Integeri:

Bug#680084: nmu

2012-11-13 Thread Julien Cristau
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 00:30:06 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 16:57:30 -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote: > > > Hi, I've uploaded an nmu fixing this issue to delayed/7. The extra > > time is to give you a chance to do a maintainer upload instead. > > Please see attached patc

Bug#680084: nmu

2012-11-12 Thread Michael Gilbert
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 6:30 PM, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 16:57:30 -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote: > >> Hi, I've uploaded an nmu fixing this issue to delayed/7. The extra >> time is to give you a chance to do a maintainer upload instead. >> Please see attached patch. >> > Isn'

Bug#680084: nmu

2012-11-12 Thread Julien Cristau
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 16:57:30 -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote: > Hi, I've uploaded an nmu fixing this issue to delayed/7. The extra > time is to give you a chance to do a maintainer upload instead. > Please see attached patch. > Isn't this bug just a dupe of 684293, in which case it doesn't need

Bug#680084: nmu

2012-11-12 Thread Michael Gilbert
Hi, I've uploaded an nmu fixing this issue to delayed/7. The extra time is to give you a chance to do a maintainer upload instead. Please see attached patch. Best wishes, Mike os-prober.patch Description: Binary data