> > - I guessed it OK? I fear not, because I was unable to generate
> > an unique summary_lp="" in eval_C :-(
>
> hrm, not quite sure what you are trying to do here. don't we already have a
> summary_lp line?
Yes, but I was looking for a method to generate a summary plus a
description whi
Niccolo,
please keep the cc line (to bugs.debian.org) so that we can keep track of
this in the BTS.
> I'd like to release something better, but we are in freeze. Do
> you think we can add some files to the package? I mean a README
> with some guidelines like that:
oh, i thought this was alread
sent to me privately
- Forwarded message from Niccolo Rigacci <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Date: Sun, 02 Jul 2000 09:15:08 +0200
From: "Niccolo Rigacci" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Randolph Chung" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Bug#66578: Module descrip
Niccolo,
As the de facto package maintainer I will be the first to admit that the
status of the module messages is totally ridiculous. As you pointed out
there are many inaccuracies and omissions.
Some time late last year we looked into revamping the modconf system
completely, however, because o
Package: modconf
Version: 0.2.26.14
Subject: No
I wondered a lot installing potato when I discovered that many
modules are marked with "(No description available)" by modconf.
In many cases no help is given about parameters, in other totally
wrong help is given (noticeably parameters for lp.o).
T
5 matches
Mail list logo
