Control: fixed -1 3.0~rc.2
On Tue, 22 May 2012 14:25:07 -0600, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Colin Tuckley [2012-05-22 18:08]:
> > I've noticed that when the kernel gets upgraded by apt-get upgrade that
> > it does *not* run flash-kernel on my Squeeze system.
>
> This is a well known issue which
Processing control commands:
> fixed -1 3.0~rc.2
Bug #656877 [flash-kernel] flash-kernel is not being run for kernel upgrades
with unchanged ABI version
Bug #673418 [flash-kernel] flash-kernel is not being run for kernel upgrades
with unchanged ABI version
Bug #701781 [flash-kernel] linux-image-
On 22/05/12 21:25, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> This is a well known issue which has been resolved in testing/unstable:
>
> flash-kernel (3.0~rc.2) experimental; urgency=low
>
> * New kernel and initramfs hooks, new logic: flash-kernel always installs
> the latest version according to linux-v
* Colin Tuckley [2012-05-22 18:08]:
> I've noticed that when the kernel gets upgraded by apt-get upgrade that
> it does *not* run flash-kernel on my Squeeze system.
This is a well known issue which has been resolved in testing/unstable:
flash-kernel (3.0~rc.2) experimental; urgency=low
* New
I've noticed that when the kernel gets upgraded by apt-get upgrade that
it does *not* run flash-kernel on my Squeeze system.
I have a suspicion that the fact that the kernel name/version has not
changed might have something to do with it.
Before upgrade:
colin@muscat:~$ uname -a
Linux muscat 2.6
5 matches
Mail list logo
