> Right. But in this case, the bug that prevents me from installing
> boot-floppies is a bug (among others) that is preventing the release
> of Debian 2.3. It is `release critical'.
a) potato is Debian 2.2. Debian 2.3 (woody) will not be releasing for
quite a few months.
M
On Sun, Jun 11, 2000 at 09:38:42AM -0400, Robert J. Chassell wrote:
>Yes you should, and you can't because of tetex, which is a bug in tetext!.
>If you filed a bug on every package that could not be installed because
>another package could not be installed we would have a sphaghetti of
Yes you should, and you can't because of tetex, which is a bug in tetext!.
If you filed a bug on every package that could not be installed because
another package could not be installed we would have a sphaghetti of
inter-dependent bug reports.
Right. But in this case, the bug that
>... Although there is no way it is holding up boot-floppies
>considering *every* (and that means all 6) one of the archs releasing with
>potato have built boot-floppies 2.2.15. They are in the archive, go check.
>So, it is not holding up anything.
>
> This is false. I cannot ins
Many thanks for your response. Obviously, you are not having the
problem I am having.
But I would not be making this bug report unless
`apt-get dist-upgrade' and `apt-get -f install' were
telling me all is well, yet I cannot then install boot-floppies.
This is the problem: there is something
On Fri, Jun 09, 2000 at 09:26:14PM -0400, Robert J. Chassell wrote:
>> Also, I thought that the problems with boot-floppies were holding back
>> this release: they are critical.
>
>come one. I've build 2.2.15 in a chroot and installed those packages wia apt
>and it worked OK.
>
>
> Also, I thought that the problems with boot-floppies were holding back
> this release: they are critical.
come one. I've build 2.2.15 in a chroot and installed those packages wia apt
and it worked OK.
How did you do that? I cannot.
> I will remind the tetex-bin maintainers tha
On Fri, Jun 09, 2000 at 04:33:09PM -0400 , Robert J. Chassell wrote:
> But why is boot-floppies dependant on tetex-bin in the first place?
docs
> Surely you can create a system without loading all of TeX? Not that I
> am against TeX, I use it all the time, for printing Texinfo
> documents. But
> Package: boot-floppies
> Version: 2.2.15
>
> Linux megalith 2.2.12 #1 Thu Oct 14 09:29:24 EST 1999 i686 unknown
> /lib/libc.so.6 -> libc-2.1.3.so
Wouldn't tetex-bin be the right place to file this bug? How can a package
be held accountable for bugs on the packages it depen
On Fri, Jun 09, 2000 at 03:40:41PM -0400, Robert J. Chassell wrote:
> Package: boot-floppies
> Version: 2.2.15
>
> Linux megalith 2.2.12 #1 Thu Oct 14 09:29:24 EST 1999 i686 unknown
> /lib/libc.so.6 -> libc-2.1.3.so
Wouldn't tetex-bin be the right place to file this bug? How can a package
be hel
Package: boot-floppies
Version: 2.2.15
Linux megalith 2.2.12 #1 Thu Oct 14 09:29:24 EST 1999 i686 unknown
/lib/libc.so.6 -> libc-2.1.3.so
When I attempt to install boot-floppies using apt-get, I receive a message
dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of boot-floppies:
boot-fl
11 matches
Mail list logo
