Bug#637082: #637082

2011-11-20 Thread Robert Millan
2011/11/20 Michael Tokarev : >> (FYI, FreeBSD mount canonicalizes, but it might be gratuitous there too) > > I don't see where it does that.  It canonicalizes the target directory > argument, that's for sure, but not the "spec" argument.  See > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sbin/mount/m

Bug#637082: #637082

2011-11-20 Thread Michael Tokarev
On 01.11.2011 21:24, Robert Millan wrote: > 2011/11/1 Michael Tokarev : >> But whole approach - trying to canonicalize the path this way - >> is most likely wrong. It shouldn't be needed for the kernel >> since it will do path resolution internally anyway during >> mount. And it breaks various ps

Bug#637082: #637082

2011-11-01 Thread Robert Millan
2011/11/1 Michael Tokarev : > But whole approach - trying to canonicalize the path this way - > is most likely wrong.  It shouldn't be needed for the kernel > since it will do path resolution internally anyway during > mount.  And it breaks various pseudo filesystems, incl. > tmpfs, aufs, nfs, etc,

Bug#637082: #637082

2011-11-01 Thread Michael Tokarev
[Cc'ing #637082 - hope you dont mind...] On 01.11.2011 19:52, Robert Millan wrote: > Hi Michael, > > Btw, with all this mess it seems you forgot about my patch in #637082. > If everything is okay with it, would be cool if it can be included > with next upload. > No I didn't really forgot about