On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 21:56:29 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> That said if you want to avoid it, what are the base packages where
> it must absolutely be avoided?
>
> All essential + their (transitive) dependencies?
>
Seems like it's Priority: required (and dependencies) + binutils (for
the f
Hi Otavio,
On Sun, 24 Jul 2011, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> It seems XZ support has been included in 1.0.21, as can be seen at:
Yeah but debian-installer doesn't have bzip2 and xz in the host so it's
not really useful... you saw the recent bugs when libacl used bz2
compression.
> About the use of
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 08:43, Raphaël Hertzog wrote:
> Please can you add support for XZ-compressed .deb and/or tell us which
> package should not use XZ compression so that we can modify them
> to hardcode gzip usage?
It seems XZ support has been included in 1.0.21, as can be seen at:
debootst
Package: debootstrap
Version: 1.0.32
Severity: wishlist
User: debian-d...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: xz-compression
Hello,
we discussed some time ago on debian-devel (in a ftpmaster-related thread)
the possiblity to switch dpkg-deb to generate XZ-compressed debs by
default. ftp-master.debian.org
4 matches
Mail list logo
