Julien Cristau, le Fri 25 Feb 2011 18:44:22 +0100, a écrit :
> Why "at best"? It sounds like checking whether the active VT is in
> KD_TEXT is exactly what's needed here.
No, because that may just be an fbterm, still using the normal keyboard
processing, and not Xorg.
Samuel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
Julien Cristau, le Sat 26 Feb 2011 01:18:27 +0100, a écrit :
> On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 01:15:33 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>
> > Julien Cristau, le Fri 25 Feb 2011 18:44:22 +0100, a écrit :
> > > Why "at best"? It sounds like checking whether the active VT is in
> > > KD_TEXT is exactly what's
On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 01:15:33 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Julien Cristau, le Fri 25 Feb 2011 18:44:22 +0100, a écrit :
> > Why "at best"? It sounds like checking whether the active VT is in
> > KD_TEXT is exactly what's needed here.
>
> No, because that may just be an fbterm, still using
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 20:20:47 +0200, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 06:44:22PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> >
> > Why "at best"? It sounds like checking whether the active VT is in
> > KD_TEXT is exactly what's needed here.
>
> How can this be tested?
>
Something like this
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 06:44:22PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
>
> Why "at best"? It sounds like checking whether the active VT is in
> KD_TEXT is exactly what's needed here.
How can this be tested?
Anton Zinoviev
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subj
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 14:05:07 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Otavio Salvador, le Fri 25 Feb 2011 13:01:59 +, a écrit :
> > if pidof X > /dev/null; then
> > echo "X is running"
> > else
> > echo "X isn't running"
> > fi
>
> Errr, surely not :)
>
> What Anton wants is to know wheth
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 07:30:53PM +0200, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 12:23:27PM -0500, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> >
> > Is 'fgconsole' of any help if one could combine it with knowing which
> > vt's have X currently running?
>
> Indeed!
Probably linux only though.
--
Len So
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 12:23:27PM -0500, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
>
> Is 'fgconsole' of any help if one could combine it with knowing which
> vt's have X currently running?
Indeed!
Anton Zinoviev
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 06:00:43PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Anton Zinoviev (25/02/2011):
> > Testing the standard output and standard input never worked because
> > they are redirected by Debconf. In particular /usr/bin/tty outputs
> > "not a tty". For a long time the following code worke
Hi,
Anton Zinoviev (25/02/2011):
> Testing the standard output and standard input never worked because
> they are redirected by Debconf. In particular /usr/bin/tty outputs
> "not a tty". For a long time the following code worked:
>
> case `readlink /proc/self/fd/2` in
> /dev/tty[0-
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 02:05:07PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>
> What Anton wants is to know whether X is currently at the front or not.
> And you can't rely on DISPLAY being set (since you could be from sudo su
> -), and you can't rely on stdin being the VT (since you could be from
> screen).
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 13:05, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Otavio Salvador, le Fri 25 Feb 2011 13:01:59 +, a écrit :
>> if pidof X > /dev/null; then
>> echo "X is running"
>> else
>> echo "X isn't running"
>> fi
>
> Errr, surely not :)
heh.
> What Anton wants is to know whether X is cur
Otavio Salvador, le Fri 25 Feb 2011 13:01:59 +, a écrit :
> if pidof X > /dev/null; then
> echo "X is running"
> else
> echo "X isn't running"
> fi
Errr, surely not :)
What Anton wants is to know whether X is currently at the front or not.
And you can't rely on DISPLAY being set (sinc
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 00:20, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Anton Zinoviev, le Thu 24 Feb 2011 07:28:18 +0200, a écrit :
>> True. Other people have complained about this too. Unfortunately I
>> don't know a reliable way to test whether we are on the console or in X
>> and it is generally dangerous t
Anton Zinoviev, le Thu 24 Feb 2011 07:28:18 +0200, a écrit :
> True. Other people have complained about this too. Unfortunately I
> don't know a reliable way to test whether we are on the console or in X
> and it is generally dangerous to reconfigure the console if X is active.
Maybe dpkg-reco
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 10:57:05PM -0600, Javier Vasquez wrote:
>
> Found the issue with the failure, but I don't like the solution, :-)
> One of the things keyboard-configuration doesn't ask, is whether there
> are alternative languages to the primary ones,
I suppose this is not going to change b
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 10:50 PM, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> reassign 614127 console-setup
> severity 614127 normal
> forcemerge 614550 614127
> thanks
>
> On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 09:35:42PM -0600, Javier Vasquez wrote:
>>
>> Package: console-setup
>> Version: 1.69
>>
>> Package: xkb-data
>> Version:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 614127 console-setup
Bug #614127 [console-data] keyboard layout doesn't keep after reboot
Bug reassigned from package 'console-data' to 'console-setup'.
Bug No longer marked as found in versions console-data/2:1.10-9.
> severity 614127 no
18 matches
Mail list logo
