On Wed, 2011-02-16 at 00:50 +0100, Tech Nux wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I found an easier solution, Xen dom0 on squeeze / DomU on lenny the
> dist-upgrade and reboot failed. :
Thanks.
This is a somewhat separate (although related) problem to the original
issue with installation.
The original issue was a c
Hi,
I found an easier solution, Xen dom0 on squeeze / DomU on lenny the
dist-upgrade and reboot failed. :
First mount the /boot partition of your domU to the dom0 :
xm block-attach 0 phy:/dev/vm/squeeze xvda w
mount /dev/xvda1 /mnt
Then edit /mnt/grub/menu.lst, and comment thoses line :
#title
On Tue, 2010-11-23 at 22:22 +, Miguel Figueiredo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > > The correct behaviour for Grub2 is to use /boot/grub/grub.cfg [1]
> >
> > Correct.
> >
> > > but pygrub doesn't recognize grub2. Is this correct?
> >
> > Specifically the pygrub in Lenny does not recognize grub2.
> >
>
Hi,
> > The correct behaviour for Grub2 is to use /boot/grub/grub.cfg [1]
>
> Correct.
>
> > but pygrub doesn't recognize grub2. Is this correct?
>
> Specifically the pygrub in Lenny does not recognize grub2.
>
> The pygrub in Squeeze recognizes and works with grub2.
>
> Ian.
Is lilo is sup
On Tue, 2010-11-23 at 22:06 +, Miguel Figueiredo wrote:
> A Terça 23 Novembro 2010 08:23:39 Ian Campbell você escreveu:
> > On Mon, 2010-11-22 at 21:21 +, Miguel Figueiredo wrote:
> > > A Sábado 20 Novembro 2010 00:17:14 Daniel Pocock você escreveu:
> > > > Package: installation-reports
>
A Terça 23 Novembro 2010 08:23:39 Ian Campbell você escreveu:
> On Mon, 2010-11-22 at 21:21 +, Miguel Figueiredo wrote:
> > A Sábado 20 Novembro 2010 00:17:14 Daniel Pocock você escreveu:
> > > Package: installation-reports
> >
> > should the BR be moved from installation-reports to a specific
On Mon, 2010-11-22 at 21:21 +, Miguel Figueiredo wrote:
> A Sábado 20 Novembro 2010 00:17:14 Daniel Pocock você escreveu:
> > Package: installation-reports
>
> should the BR be moved from installation-reports to a specific package?
Almost certainly but I don't know which, partly because it's
A Sábado 20 Novembro 2010 00:17:14 Daniel Pocock você escreveu:
> Package: installation-reports
should the BR be moved from installation-reports to a specific package?
--
Melhores cumprimentos/Best regards,
Miguel Figueiredo
http://www.DebianPT.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-re
Ian Campbell wrote:
On Sat, 2010-11-20 at 18:48 +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote:
Ultimately, I believe Debian 5 (lenny) is still a supported option for
people after the release of squeeze and up to the release date of
Debian 7.
oldstable is generally supported for a little while after a
On Sat, 2010-11-20 at 18:48 +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> Ultimately, I believe Debian 5 (lenny) is still a supported option for
> people after the release of squeeze and up to the release date of
> Debian 7.
oldstable is generally supported for a little while after a new stable
release but it is
Hi Ian, thanks for the prompt feedback
I've provided more details about some of those points below
Ultimately, I believe Debian 5 (lenny) is still a supported option for
people after the release of squeeze and up to the release date of Debian 7.
For me, this was the only bad experience I ha
Hi Daniel,
On Sat, 2010-11-20 at 01:17 +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> Package: installation-reports
>
> I have an amd64 dom0 with lenny
>
> I successfully run the Debian Installer in a fresh domU
>
> xm create -c xm-squeeze1.cfg install=true
> install-mirror=http://mirror.positive-internet.com
Package: installation-reports
I have an amd64 dom0 with lenny
I successfully run the Debian Installer in a fresh domU
xm create -c xm-squeeze1.cfg install=true
install-mirror=http://mirror.positive-internet.com/debian
install-installer=http://ftp.nl.debian.org/debian/dists/testing/main/instal
13 matches
Mail list logo
