Bug#541831: installation-reports: Sunfire T2000 success (one minor issue)

2009-09-16 Thread Frans Pop
On Wednesday 16 September 2009, Stephen Gran wrote: > FWIW, I've been pointed at > http://lists.debian.org/debian-sparc/2009/04/msg00024.html . The follow > up suggests it may already have some fixes in? It's possible I may not > have gotten the r1 image, although I thought I was using the latest

Bug#541831: installation-reports: Sunfire T2000 success (one minor issue)

2009-09-16 Thread Frans Pop
On Wednesday 16 September 2009, Frans Pop wrote: > Yep, I know about that post, but I'm not sure whether that's related or > not. AFAIK that issue was about having no console output at all, not > about incorrect configuration of the installed system. Well, the second part of the mail is this issue

Bug#541831: installation-reports: Sunfire T2000 success (one minor issue)

2009-09-16 Thread Stephen Gran
This one time, at band camp, Frans Pop said: > Hi Stephen, Hi Frans, > Are you interested in persuing this further? In case you're not, I'm > tagging the BR for posterity. I am interested - my problem at the moment is that the machine has been promised for the sparc64 port. I'm waiting on doko

Processed: Re: Bug#541831: installation-reports: Sunfire T2000 success (one minor issue)

2009-09-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > user debian-boot@lists.debian.org Setting user to debian-boot@lists.debian.org (was sg...@debian.org). > usertags 541831 sparc Bug#541831: installation-reports: Sunfire T2000 success (one minor issue) There were no usertags set. Usertags a

Bug#541831: installation-reports: Sunfire T2000 success (one minor issue)

2009-09-16 Thread Frans Pop
user debian-boot@lists.debian.org usertags 541831 sparc tags 541831 moreinfo thanks Hi Stephen, On Wednesday 26 August 2009, Frans Pop wrote: > On Monday 17 August 2009, Stephen Gran wrote: > > > It sounds like the "rsc console" is something different, which could > > > explain what you saw. Mayb

Bug#541831: installation-reports: Sunfire T2000 success (one minor issue)

2009-08-26 Thread Frans Pop
On Monday 17 August 2009, Stephen Gran wrote: > > It sounds like the "rsc console" is something different, which could > > explain what you saw. Maybe we need special handling for this case. > > The rsc is much like an iLo or alom. It's just another management > interface that offers a 'console' i

Bug#541831: installation-reports: Sunfire T2000 success (one minor issue)

2009-08-17 Thread Stephen Gran
This one time, at band camp, Frans Pop said: > reassign 541831 finish-install 2.22 > thanks > > On Sunday 16 August 2009, Stephen Gran wrote: > > Comments/Problems: > > The only complaint from the install is that after the install was > > completed and the machine rebooted, there was no getty list

Processed: Re: Bug#541831: installation-reports: Sunfire T2000 success (one minor issue)

2009-08-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 541831 finish-install 2.22 Bug #541831 [installation-reports] installation-reports: Sunfire T2000 success (one minor issue) Bug reassigned from package 'installation-reports' to 'finish-install'. Bug #541831 [finish-install] installation

Bug#541831: installation-reports: Sunfire T2000 success (one minor issue)

2009-08-16 Thread Frans Pop
reassign 541831 finish-install 2.22 thanks On Sunday 16 August 2009, Stephen Gran wrote: > Comments/Problems: > The only complaint from the install is that after the install was > completed and the machine rebooted, there was no getty listening on > ttyS0. Was the installation itself done over tt

Bug#541831: installation-reports: Sunfire T2000 success (one minor issue)

2009-08-16 Thread Stephen Gran
Package: installation-reports Severity: normal -- Package-specific info: Boot method: network Image version: http://ftp.nl.debian.org/debian/dists/lenny/main/installer-sparc/current/images/netboot/boot.img Date: 2009-08-15 Machine: Sun Sunfire T2000 Partitions: sg...@zee:~$ df -Tl Filesystem