On Sat, 2008-11-22 at 13:56 +0100, Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 03:31:42PM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > Jérémy are you OK with me reverting r55059. According to #464962 the
> > issue is fixed in the kernel with 2.6.26-8.
>
> Please do so…
Thanks. I've committed it now. I'm not
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 03:31:42PM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> Jérémy are you OK with me reverting r55059. According to #464962 the
> issue is fixed in the kernel with 2.6.26-8.
Please do so…
(and for the whole team: please accept my apologies for being mostly MIA
these days.)
Cheers,
--
Jérém
On Fri, 2008-11-21 at 16:36 +0100, Guido Günther wrote:
>
> virt-install -n xenfoo1 -r 96 --disk path=/dev/blockdevice,device=disk
> --location=http://ftp.nl.debian.org/debian/dists/testing/main/installer-i386
Neat tool, I hadn't seen it before.
BTW, the Vcs-{Browser,Git} tags in your debian/con
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 03:31:42PM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-11-21 at 16:20 +0100, Guido Günther wrote:
> > Hi Ian,
> > On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 04:32:16PM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2008-10-31 at 17:22 +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 04:31:0
On Fri, 2008-11-21 at 16:20 +0100, Guido Günther wrote:
> Hi Ian,
> On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 04:32:16PM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Fri, 2008-10-31 at 17:22 +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 04:31:00PM +0100, Guido Günther wrote:
> > > > So to me it seems the workaround
Hi Ian,
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 04:32:16PM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-10-31 at 17:22 +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 04:31:00PM +0100, Guido Günther wrote:
> > > So to me it seems the workaround can be removed:
> > > * removed for VIA Ester altogeher
> > > *
On Fri, 2008-10-31 at 17:22 +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 04:31:00PM +0100, Guido Günther wrote:
> > So to me it seems the workaround can be removed:
> > * removed for VIA Ester altogeher
> > * removed vor VIA Nehemiah once we ship 2.6.27
>
> Please read #464962 first.
O
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 03:52:43PM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
[..snip..]
> > > d-i should have installed the 686-bigmem image when running under Xen
> > > due to the use of the 686-bigmem kernel for the Xen variant of the
> > > installer. I'll investigate why this didn't happen.
> > >
> > > Could
On Fri, 2008-10-31 at 17:11 +0100, Guido Günther wrote:
> Yes, this looks just right!
This is functionally identical but is more self-documenting...
diff --git a/packages/base-installer/debian/changelog
b/packages/base-installer/debian/changelog
index 59404b5..5fd1b4c 100644
--- a/packages/base-
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 04:31:00PM +0100, Guido Günther wrote:
> So to me it seems the workaround can be removed:
> * removed for VIA Ester altogeher
> * removed vor VIA Nehemiah once we ship 2.6.27
Please read #464962 first.
Bastian
--
Women professionals do tend to over-compensate.
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 03:46:22PM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> diff --git a/packages/base-installer/kernel/i386.sh
> b/packages/base-installer/kernel/i386.sh
> index cba6d9b..e8929ea 100644
> --- a/packages/base-installer/kernel/i386.sh
> +++ b/packages/base-installer/kernel/i386.sh
> @@ -36,10 +
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 03:38:30PM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-10-31 at 16:31 +0100, Guido Günther wrote:
> > Hi Ian,
> > On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 01:26:08PM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > [..snip..]
> > > > d-i should have installed the 686-bigmem image when running under Xen
> > > >
On Fri, 2008-10-31 at 16:44 +0100, Guido Günther wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 12:56:48PM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Fri, 2008-10-31 at 12:58 +0100, Guido Guenther wrote:
> > > Package: installation-reports
> > > Version: 2.38
> > > Severity: normal
> > >
> > > Boot method: network
> > >
On Fri, 2008-10-31 at 15:38 +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > So to me it seems the workaround can be removed:
> > * removed for VIA Ester altogeher
> > * removed vor VIA Nehemiah once we ship 2.6.27
>
> Do you happen to know the Family/Model for the Nehemiah?
>
> Your cpuinfo shows that Esther i
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 12:56:48PM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-10-31 at 12:58 +0100, Guido Guenther wrote:
> > Package: installation-reports
> > Version: 2.38
> > Severity: normal
> >
> > Boot method: network
> > Image version: http://people.debian.org/~joeyh/d-i/images/current/
> >
On Fri, 2008-10-31 at 16:31 +0100, Guido Günther wrote:
> Hi Ian,
> On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 01:26:08PM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> [..snip..]
> > > d-i should have installed the 686-bigmem image when running under Xen
> > > due to the use of the 686-bigmem kernel for the Xen variant of the
> > >
Hi Ian,
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 01:26:08PM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
[..snip..]
> > d-i should have installed the 686-bigmem image when running under Xen
> > due to the use of the 686-bigmem kernel for the Xen variant of the
> > installer. I'll investigate why this didn't happen.
>
> It seems to
On Fri, 2008-10-31 at 12:56 +, Ian Campbell wrote:
>
> > The installtion itself worked great but d-i failed to install an
> > appropriate kernel for Xen Paravirt so the system failed to boot.
> > To fix this up I mounted the partition in the dom0 and installed the
> > correct kernel. d-i ins
On Fri, 2008-10-31 at 12:58 +0100, Guido Guenther wrote:
> Package: installation-reports
> Version: 2.38
> Severity: normal
>
> Boot method: network
> Image version: http://people.debian.org/~joeyh/d-i/images/current/
> Date: 20081031
>
> Machine: Xen Paravirtual machine on a lenny Dom0
> Partiti
Package: installation-reports
Version: 2.38
Severity: normal
Boot method: network
Image version: http://people.debian.org/~joeyh/d-i/images/current/
Date: 20081031
Machine: Xen Paravirtual machine on a lenny Dom0
Partitions:
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/xv
20 matches
Mail list logo
