On Tuesday 26 February 2008, Robert Millan wrote:
> > Because you did not create a separate /boot partition and grub does not
> > support booting from LVM.
>
> It does, starting with GRUB 2. I need to test this setup with D-I, when
> I get a minute..
I'm aware of that, but that's not really relev
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 06:47:01PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 06:18:26PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> > On Friday 22 February 2008, Igor Morgado wrote:
> > > Comments/Problems:
> > > Lilo failed to install (reported that) but it was sucessufuly installed.
> > > Why not grub?
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 06:18:26PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Friday 22 February 2008, Igor Morgado wrote:
> > Comments/Problems:
> > Lilo failed to install (reported that) but it was sucessufuly installed.
> > Why not grub?
>
> Because you did not create a separate /boot partition and grub does
On Friday 22 February 2008, Igor Morgado wrote:
> Comments/Problems:
> Lilo failed to install (reported that) but it was sucessufuly installed.
> Why not grub?
Because you did not create a separate /boot partition and grub does not
support booting from LVM.
> There is nothing in /var/log/debian
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: 2008/02/21
http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/4.0_r3/i386/iso-cd/debian-40r3-i386-netinst.iso
uname -a: Linux sfrancisco 2.6.18-6-686 #1 SMP Sun Feb 10 22:11:31 UTC
2008 i686 GNU/Linux
Date: Thu Feb 21 19:03:24 BRT 2008
Metho
5 matches
Mail list logo